Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 8;6:1332707. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1332707

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included studies.

# Author and country Year Journal Study design and methods Type of eHealth technology Topics related to implementation
1 Bahls et al, Germany (36) 2020 Journal of Translational Medicine Qualitative:
  • -

    Interdisciplinary workshops with family doctors, experienced researchers, medical data managers, software architects and developers, data security experts and Technology, Methods, and Infrastructure for Networked Medical Research staff

  • -

    Practices of family doctors are visited and discussions with staff were held

A generic architecture with a technical framework of tools, interfaces, and workflows for practicable and secure processing of patient data family doctors Information about the design, implementation, and pilot testing of this generic research architecture and workflows that unlock primary care data for secondary usage
2 Botrugno et al, Italy (37) 2018 Health Policy and Technology (Elsevier) Not specified Telemedicine in general Information about exploring available provisions for an EU regulatory framework for telemedicine, and to assess their suitability to regulate remote care services
3 Briganti et al, Belgium (38) 2020 Frontiers in Medicine Not specified Artificial Intelligence in healthcare Information about the benefits, future opportunities, and risks of established AI applications in clinical practice on physicians, healthcare institutions, medical education, and bioethics
4 Cobianchi et al., Italy (39) 2022 Journal of the American College of Surgeons Qualitative:
  • Stakeholder workshop with experts in the fields of academic surgery, radiology, surgical ethics, AI and Machine-learning, computer sciences, innovation, strategy, business models, and healthcare policies

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications aiming to support surgical decision-making processes Information about mostly ethical (but also legal, technological, and business model related) factors that need to be considered when implementing AI applications to support surgical decision-making. These include factors related to human agency and oversight, technical robustness, privacy, and safety of data, diversity, and non-discrimination, societal and environmental well-being, and accountability.
5 Cresswell et al, United Kingdom (40) 2019 BMJ Health & Care Informatics Qualitative:
  • -

    Complementing recent work conducted by the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) exploring potential policy frameworks and associated strategies for Patient Generated Health Data

Integration of patient generated data into electronic health records Information about applying emerging policy frameworks to the United Kingdom and outline five key priority areas that are intended to guide policymakers’ decision-making for patient generated data integration into electronic health records
6 Diaz-Skeete et al, Ireland (41) 2020 Health Informatics Journal Qualitative:
  • -

    Interactive workshop with clinicians, academic researchers, technologists, patient advocates, policy makers, and representatives from the health service

eHealth technologies (in particular remote monitoring systems) in community and home cardiac care Information about the barriers and facilitators to the adoption of eHealth technology in community and home cardiac care
7 Gaebel et al, Germany (42) 2020 European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Mixed-method:
  • -

    Narrative review (status analysis of 6 countries)

  • -

    Qualitative stakeholder interviews (52 interviews with experts in science, politics, small-to-medium enterprises, care providers, and patients

e-Mental Health Innovations Information about the uptake of E-mental health, including barriers for implementation (for six different countries). Policy recommendations were provided to guide political and regulatory processes regarding the implementation of e-mental health.
8 Garani-Papadatos et al., Greece (43) 2022 Frontiers in Digital Health Qualitative:
  • -

    Ethical exploration of specific eHealth technology (MyPal4Kids)

A digital health platform in a palliative care context (pediatric cancer patients) Information about ethical challenges, the paper provides information about what ethical considerations occurred in the development and implementation of this digital health platform, and what type of decisions they made (e.g., in terms of technological features) to tackle the barriers they explored.
9 Gilbert et al., Germany (44) 2023 Journal of Medical Internet Research Qualitative:
  • -

    Multistakeholder interactive workshops with healthcare professionals, regulators, healthcare providers, healthcare system digitization bodies, regulatory science and law academics, regulatory specialists, and consultants

Digital health technologies, particularly AI-based tools and machine learning medical tools Information about the divergent approaches of the European Union and the United States in the implementation of new regulatory approaches in digital health. The paper poses specific challenges to the development and implementation of functional regulation (such as the MDR).
10 Jacquemard et al, Ireland (45) 2021 BMC Medical Ethics Qualitative:
  • -

    Re-examination of literature to determine ethical challenges and opportunities

  • -

    Workshops with multidisciplinary stakeholders (ethicist, senior hospital-based physician, eHealth expert) to discuss and reach consensus on interpretation of the literature

Electronic health records Information about ethical concerns that occur in the design, development, implementation, and use of an electronic health records
11 Jusob et al., United Kingdom (46) 2022 Journal of Public Health Qualitative:
  • -

    Modified version of the engineering design process

A novel privacy framework to address privacy threats/concerns in the context of mHealth and the management of chronic diseases Information about possible privacy threats and concerns in the development and implementation of mHealth. The paper proposes a new privacy framework for mHealth, in which they describe requirements for the framework and the choices they made based on these requirements.
12 Karacic Zanetti and Nunes, Croatia (47) 2023 Computers Qualitative:
  • -

    Investigation of health wallets’ specific features and capabilities

Health wallet (an integrated digital platform that allows individuals to manage and control their own health information) Information about the implementation of health wallets. In particular a risk-based approach to identify and prioritize data security risks, system interoperability, cross-border healthcare challenges, data accuracy, and ethical challenges. The paper provides a practical framework for healthcare organizations to allocate resources while ensuring that patient data remain secure and private.
13 Kühler et al, France (48) 2022 Clinical Therapeutics Qualitative:
  • -

    Working group with experts from pharmaceutical, medical device, and tech companies

Not a specific eHealth technology, but the paper focusses on European Union regulatory frameworks for connected combined products, such as medical devices Information about identified challenges in developing and releasing connected combined products and the paper highlights and discusses gaps in the European Union Regulations.
14 Leimanis et al, Latvia (49) 2021 European Journal of Sustainable Development Qualitative:
  • -

    Considering of international legal regulations

Artificial Intelligence in healthcare Information about ethical, regulatory, and social issues raised by applying artificial intelligence in healthcare, from sustainable development perspective
15 Li et al., United Kingdom (50) 2023 BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Qualitative:
  • -

    Interview study

Electronic Health Records (EHR) Information about (the lack of) EHR interoperability, including facilitators and barriers to improve EHR interoperability.
16 Martani et al, Switzerland (51) 2019 Swiss Medical Weekly Qualitative:
  • -

    Field research into all insurers’ data-sharing apps on the Swiss Market

Insurers’ apps that permit customers to share their data in exchange for monetary rewards Information about the features and functioning of the apps, and ethically relevant aspects related to the usage of these apps.
17 Parimbelli et al, Italy (52) 2018 International Journal of Medical Informatics (Elsevier) Qualitative:
  • -

    Workshops with system developers, researchers, physicians, nurses, legal experts, healthcare economists, and administrators

Telemedicine systems, with the focus on real-world, non-mediate interaction with the final user Information about the risks and legal implications connected to the development and use of modern telemedicine systems.
18 Prodan et al, Germany (53) 2022 Frontiers in Digital Health Qualitative:
  • -

    Interviews with public bodies and industry

  • -

    Multi-stakeholder workshop

Digital therapeutics (“apps on prescription”) Information about how the approval and adoption of digital therapeutics within health systems have been approached in five selected European countries and regions, including success factors that scale up the adoption.
19 Rakers et al., The Netherlands (54) 2023 Elsevier Health Policy and Technology Qualitative:
  • -

    Interview study

Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Information about the barriers and facilitators of structural reimbursement of RPM in hospital care in the Netherlands. In addition, the paper proposes actionable recommendations.
20 Rauwerdink et al, the Netherlands (55) 2021 Journal of Medical Internet Research Mixed method:
  • -

    Questionnaire

  • -

    Semi-structured interviews

eHealth technologies with various subjects and themes, from the Citrien Fund program eHealth (2016–2019) Information about the barriers and facilitators of the development of the 29 included eHealth projects
21 Redrup Hill et al., United Kingdom (56) 2023 Frontiers of Digital Health Qualitative:
  • -

    Multistakeholder interactive workshops

A semi-automated deep-learning system (AI) with as example the clinical pathway for the early detection of Barett's Oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Information about ethical and legal considerations that influence human involvement in the implementation of AI in a clinical pathway. Opinions of stakeholders are shared about the risks and potential harms of AI, the impact of AI on human experts, equity and bias, transparency and oversight, patient information and choice, and accountability, moral responsibility, and liability for errors.
22 Reindl et al, Germany (57) 2021 IEEE Xplore Not specified Robot-assisted haptic telepresence tools Information about the legal framework of telemedicine in EU, and practical physical safety, data security, and system usability implications learned from implementing a telemedicine station prototype.
23 Schlieter et al, Germany (58) 2019 Journal of Medical Internet Research Qualitative:
  • -

    2-Round group workshop

Digital health innovations (in general) Information about enablers and barriers for scaling up digital health innovations, in the context of achieving large-scale implementations that will benefit the population as a whole
24 Scobie et al, United Kingdom (59) 2020 Learning Health Systems Qualitative:
  • -

    Seminar, bringing together National Health Service leaders, academics, practitioners, and policymakers

Learning health systems Information about requirements for the development of learning health systems, including national policy implications and actions.
25 Sheikh et al, United Kingdom (60) 2021 The Lancet Digital Health Not specified Learning health systems Information about achieving the optimal balance between top-down and bottom-up implementation, improving usability and interoperability, developing capacity for handling, processing, and analyzing data, and addressing legal and ethical challenges.
26 Shull et al, Spain (61) 2019 JMIR Medical Informatics Not specified Digital health systems (and their interoperability with electronic health records) Information about the evolution and obstacles of electronic health records, potential barriers for interoperability with digital health systems, and best practices from examples they provide.
27 Silven et al, the Netherlands (62) 2022 BMC Health Services Research Qualitative:
  • -

    Series of multidisciplinary focus groups with stakeholders who have relevant digital health expertise

Digital health in clinical practice Information about challenges of responsibility and liability when prescribing digital health in clinical practice
28 Tozzi et al, Italy (63) 2021 BioLaw Journal Not specified Artificial Intelligence in healthcare Information about potential ethical challenges and risks of implementing artificial intelligence tools in clinical practice, GDPR, and informed consent.
29 Van den Wijngaart et al, the Netherlands (64) 2018 Journal of Medical Internet Research Qualitative:
  • -

    Qualitative survey study

A web-based portal to monitor asthmatic children as a substitution for routine outpatient care Information about barriers and facilitators for the implementation and use of this web-based portal
30 Van Rooden et al, the Netherlands (65) 2021 Clinical Microbiology and Infection Qualitative:
  • -

    2 workshops of stakeholder discussions

  • -

    A taskforce was installed that further elaborated governance aspects by reviewing documents and websites, consulting experts, and organizing teleconferences

Automated surveillance for healthcare-associated infections Information about the governance aspects (both legal and ethical) of large-scale implementation of automated surveillance of infections
31 Van Velthoven et al, United Kingdom (66) 2019 Journal of Medical Internet Research Qualitative:
  • -

    Stakeholder workshop with patients, carers, local hospitals, pharmacy retailers, health insurers, health services researchers, engineers, and technology and pharmaceutical companies in Switzerland

Digital health innovations (in general) Information about facilitators and barriers of sustainable adoption of digital health innovations, needs and expectations of stakeholders, and the safety, quality, and usability of the innovations.
32 Verweij et al., The Netherlands (67) 2022 BMC Health Services Research Qualitative:
  • -

    Case study of a digital care platform with in-depth interviews

A digital health platform for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia Information about barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the digital health platform. In addition, a comprehensive implementation guide was developed for launching future digital care platforms in daily clinical platforms.
33 Wong et al, Switzerland (68) 2022 The Lancet Regional Health—Europe Not specified Digital health technologies (in context of effective surveillance systems in public health) Information about the opportunities, challenges, and implications of the increasing digitalization of public health in Europe.
34 Zarif et al, United Kingdom (69) 2022 Springer/ Health and Technology Not specified Digital health innovations (in general) Information about the ethical challenges that adoption of digital healthcare technology presents, contextualized at multiple levels, with suggested potential solutions.
35 Zemplényi et al, Hungary (70) 2023 Frontiers in Public Health Mixed method:
  • -

    Survey to rank predetermined barriers from literature

  • -

    Stakeholder workshops to develop and review recommendations based on the barriers

Artificial Intelligence tools Information about human factor related barriers, data related barriers, methodological barriers, regulatory and policy related barriers, and technological barriers of AI. In addition, this paper proposes recommendations on how to overcome the most important ones (based on a stakeholder ranking of the barriers).