Table 2.
Virological analysis latently infected undergoing UV-B induced reactivation and those not UV-B treatment.
| Parameters | UV-reactivated | UV-reactivated | Latently infected | Latently infected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured | Female | Male | Female | Male |
| % Positive samplesa | 91% | 70% | 12% | 0% |
| Mean ± SEMb | 912.6 ± 414 | 20.6 ± 12 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 0 |
| Rangec | 0–6800 pfu | 0–212 pfu | 0–8 | 0 |
| nd | 23 | 24 | 6 | 6 |
aExtracts from NIH mice that possessed at least one pfu.
bMean titer of virus ± standard error of the mean.
cRange of viral titers.
dNumber of animals in group for this single experiment.
Statistical analysis indicates that there is no difference between female and male UV-reactivated mice for % positive samples. For other comparisons between these two groups, female mice displayed greater levels for mean (P < 0.05) and for Range (P < 0.05). Comparison between UV-reactivated and latently infected only reveal that the UV-reactivated mice were greater for all parameters measured (P < 0.005).