Table 2.
Spatial and spatio-temporal models.
| A. Spatial models | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zone | BYM | Besag | iid |
| South zone | 657.24 | 663.98 | 657.22 |
| Central zone | – | – | 339.74 |
| Eastern zone | 673.24 | 678.88 | 673.23 |
| North-East zone | 298.45 | 308.90 | 298.42 |
| North zone | 497.53 | 507.42 | 497.23 |
| West zone | 428.61 | 440.48 | 428.72 |
| B. Space–time models | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model | DIC | ||
| Model without spatial and temporal autocorrelation | 235,817.60 | ||
| Model with spatial and temporal autocorrelation | 22,803.39 | ||
| AR (1) + besag | 22,804.68 | ||
| AR (1) + iid | 22,803.58 | ||
| Model with spatial and temporal autocorrelation and Type-1 interaction | 2743.68 | ||
(A) DIC of different spatial models (BYM, Besag and iid) fitted for different zones. It shows that the iid models are the best models for all zones based on the DIC values.Note: For Central zone, DIC could not be computed for Besag and BYM models and it was computed only for iid model. (B) Comparison of different spatio-temporal models with DIC. Model with spatial and temporal autocorrelation and Type-1 interaction was the best model with lowest DIC.