Table 2.

Discrimination Factor and odds of food insecurity

	n (%)	Food Insecurity Odds Ratio (95% CI) Unadjusted Model	Food Insecurity Odds Ratio (95% CI) Adjusted Model
Location of discrimination
At Work
No	91 (63.64)	Ref	Ref
Yes	52 (36.36)	1.96 (0.92, 4.19)	1.77 (0.79, 3.98)
At School
No	91 (63.64)	Ref	Ref
Yes	52 (36.36)	2.67 (1.21, 5.88)*	2.81 (1.20, 6.61)*
Housing
No	120 (83.92)	Ref	Ref
Yes	23 (16.08)	6.76 (1.51, 30.34)*	7.90 (1.93, 32.34)**
Medical
No	115 (80.42)	Ref	Ref
Yes	28 (19.58)	3.86 (1.25, 11.90)*	3.95 (1.07, 14.67)*
Restaurant
No	86 (60.14)	Ref	Ref
Yes	57 (39.86)	2.11 (1.00, 4.43)*	2.04 (0.83, 5.02)
Loans
No	123 (86.01)	Ref	Ref
Yes	20 (13.99)	5.57 (1.23, 25.21)*	3.82 (0.71, 20.53)
On the street
No	87 (60.84)	Ref	Ref
Yes	56 (39.16)	2.71 (1.26, 5.86)*	3.01 (1.23, 7.34)*
By Police
No	119 (83.22)	Ref	Ref
Yes	24 (16.78)	15.55 (2.02, 119.88)**	11.76 (1.41, 97.86)*
In Hiring
No	104 (72.73)	Ref	Ref
Yes	39 (27.27)	4.99 (1.80, 13.83)**	6.81 (1.98, 23.48)**

Adjusted models controlled for race, gender, age and income. Individual discrimination components’’ relationship with food insecurity was assessed with logistic models at p-values of *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001