Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 20;6:0158. doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0158

Table 2.

Performance of different models for independent test sets. Nos. 1 to 6 represent the 6 groups of established models. No. 7 to No. 11 represent 5 RIFSeg-Nets constructed separately using different backbones.

No. Methods P R F1-score
1 FCN 0.85 0.77 0.81
2 U-net 0.88 0.82 0.85
3 SegNet 0.88 0.85 0.86
4 FuseNet 0.86 0.81 0.83
5 MFNet 0.91 0.87 0.89
6 PSPNet 0.91 0.91 0.91
7 RTFNet 0.92 0.90 0.91
8 RIFSeg-Net-18 0.90 0.86 0.88
9 RIFSeg-Net-34 0.89 0.88 0.88
10 RIFSeg-Net-50 0.94 0.93 0.93
11 RIFSeg-Net-101 0.92 0.91 0.91
12 RIFSeg-Net-152 0.93 0.91 0.92