TABLE 2.
Semen parameters of raw specimen and after DG and MFSS processing
| Cycles | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| History | Study | DG vs. MFSS | |||||
| Raw | DG | P value | Raw | MFSS | P value | P value | |
| Volume (mL) (M ± SD) | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 0.5 ± 0 | <0.001 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 0.6 ± 0 | <0.001 | – |
| Concentration (×106/mL) (M ± SD) | 36.7 ± 32 | 12.8 ± 11 | <0.001 | 35.4 ± 31 | 8.0 ± 13 | <0.001 | – |
| Total Motility (%) (M ± SD) | 34.5 ± 15 | 71.3 ± 34* | <0.001 | 37.2 ± 11 | 96.9 ± 9* | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Normal Morphology (%) (M ± SD) | 2.0 ± 1 | 2.0 ± 1† | NS | 2.2 ± 1 | 3.3 ± 1† | <0.05 | <0.01 |
| Total SCF (%) (M ± SD) | 26.2 ± 8 | 18.0 ± 6‡ | <0.001 | 26.2 ± 8 | 1.9 ± 1‡ | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| dsDNA Fragmentation (%) (M ± SD) | 3.6 ± 2 | 3.1 ± 1ƒ | NS | 3.6 ± 2 | 0.3 ± 0.2ƒ | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Paired t-test, Effect of sperm selection method on motility.
Paired t-test, Effect of sperm selection method on normal morphology.
Paired t-test, Effect of sperm selection method on total Sperm Chromatin Fragmentation (SCF).
Paired t-test, Effect of sperm selection method on double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) fragmentation.
DG: density gradient.
MFSS: microfluidic sperm selection.