Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 22.
Published in final edited form as: Andrology. 2022 Dec 28;11(8):1605–1612. doi: 10.1111/andr.13362

TABLE 2.

Semen parameters of raw specimen and after DG and MFSS processing

Cycles
History Study DG vs. MFSS
Raw DG P value Raw MFSS P value P value
Volume (mL) (M ± SD) 2.0 ± 1.3 0.5 ± 0 <0.001 2.0 ± 1.2 0.6 ± 0 <0.001
Concentration (×106/mL) (M ± SD) 36.7 ± 32 12.8 ± 11 <0.001 35.4 ± 31 8.0 ± 13 <0.001
Total Motility (%) (M ± SD) 34.5 ± 15 71.3 ± 34* <0.001 37.2 ± 11 96.9 ± 9* <0.001 <0.001
Normal Morphology (%) (M ± SD) 2.0 ± 1 2.0 ± 1 NS 2.2 ± 1 3.3 ± 1 <0.05 <0.01
Total SCF (%) (M ± SD) 26.2 ± 8 18.0 ± 6 <0.001 26.2 ± 8 1.9 ± 1 <0.001 <0.001
dsDNA Fragmentation (%) (M ± SD) 3.6 ± 2 3.1 ± 1ƒ NS 3.6 ± 2 0.3 ± 0.2ƒ <0.001 <0.001
*

Paired t-test, Effect of sperm selection method on motility.

Paired t-test, Effect of sperm selection method on normal morphology.

Paired t-test, Effect of sperm selection method on total Sperm Chromatin Fragmentation (SCF).

ƒ

Paired t-test, Effect of sperm selection method on double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) fragmentation.

DG: density gradient.

MFSS: microfluidic sperm selection.