Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 15;50(4):369–377. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001365

Table 2.

Proportion of eyes with >30% or ≥30% central ECL from preoperative

Parameter Time
3 mo 24 mo 60 mo
iStent inject + phaco (% eyes with > 30% ECL) 11.2 (19/170) 9.4 (16/171) 9.4 (16/170)
iStent inject + phaco (% eyes with ≥ 30% ECL)a 11.2 (19/170) 9.4 (16/171) 9.4 (16/170)
Phaco control 14.3 (7/49) 4.3 (2/47) 6.3 (3/48)
P value .55 .37 FE .77 FE
Diff % (95% CI) (treatment − control) −3.1 (−14.0, 7.8) 5.1 (−2.1, 12.3) 3.2 (−5.0, 11.3)
Hydrus Microstent + phaco 17.3 (61/352) 13.6 (47/346) 20.8 (62/298)
Phaco control 9.4 (17/181) 7.2 (12/167) 10.6 (14/132)
P value .01* .03* .01*
Diff % (95% CI) (treatment − control) 7.9 (2.1, 13.7) 6.4 (1.1, 11.7) 10.2 (3.2, 17.2)
CyPass Micro-Stent + phaco 9.6 (20/209) 8.5 (18/212) 27.2 (44/162)
Phaco control 6.2 (4/65) 3.0 (2/67) 10.0 (4/40)
P value .39 .18 FE .02*
Diff % (95% CI) (treatment − control) 3.4 (−3.7, 10.5) 5.5 (0.0, 11.0) 17.2 (5.6, 28.7)

ECL = endothelial cell loss; FE = Fisher exact test; phaco = phacoemulsification

Values are listed as % (n/N). Calculations of CyPass ECL >30% 2-sided P value are from FE, assuming normal data distribution and correlation of data over time. Bonferroni correction was not performed due to the positive correlation of the measures on the same eyes over time, where Bonferroni is known to be overly conservative. By contrast, the P values reported in Table 3 of the 5-year CyPass paper used a Bonferonni correction.

*

Statistically significant