Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 15;2024:5568010. doi: 10.1155/2024/5568010

Table 1.

Correlation between maofascial pain scores and questionnaire domain scores.

Questionnaire domain scores
Bladder Bowel Prolapse Sexual Overall score
Myofascial pain location
(i) Pubococcygeus R 0.22 (0.018) 0.26 (0.004) 0.31 (<0.001) 0.38 (<0.001) 0.44 (<0.001)
(ii) Pubococcygeus L 0.15 (0.10) 0.12 (0.18) 0.05 (0.53) 0.31 (<0.001) 0.24 (0.01)
(iii) Iliococcygeus R 0.13 (0.15) 0.06 (0.49) 0.24 (0.009) 0.11 (0.21) 0.21 (0.02)
(iv) Iliococcygeus L 0.14 (0.13) 0.04 (0.63) 0.20 (0.03) 0.14 (0.13) 0.19 (0.04)
(v) Obturatorius R 0.17 (0.06) 0.15 (0.11) 0.20 (0.03) 0.34 (<0.001) 0.32 (<0.001)
(vi) Obturatorius L 0.19 (0.04) 0.16 (0.08) 0.24 (0.01) 0.29 (0.002) 0.32 (<0.001)
(vii) Bladder 0.51 (0.32) 0.44 (0.22) 0.35 (0.18) 0.43 (0.02) 0.69 (0.05)
High-tone pelvic floor 0.51 (<0.001) 0.44 (<0.001) 0.35 (<0.001) 0.43 (<0.001) 0.69 (<0.001)

Correlations and p values (in brackets) between myofascial pain locations and questionnaire scores as well as between high tone pelvic floor and questionnaire scores (Spearman's rank correlation). In case of high-tone pelvic score, polychoric correlation was calculated. Significant correlations are presented in bold. R: right, L: left.