Table 2.
The classification performance for all prediction models analyzed in this study
| model | dataset | AUC | ACC (%) | SPE (%) | SEN (%) | NPV (%) | PPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-miRPairs | Training | 0.987 | 98.47 | 98.14 | 99.25 | 99.67 | 95.82 |
| Test | 0.974 | 97.22 | 96.87 | 98.02 | 99.14 | 93.03 | |
| 139-miRPairs | Training | 1.000 | 98.95 | 98.58 | 99.81 | 99.92 | 96.80 |
| Test | 0.998 | 98.14 | 97.59 | 99.44 | 99.75 | 94.62 | |
| 106-miRPairs | Training | 1.000 | 98.90 | 98.50 | 99.81 | 99.92 | 96.63 |
| Test | 0.997 | 97.97 | 97.47 | 99.15 | 99.63 | 94.35 | |
| 253-miRPairs | training | 1.000 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Test | 0.986 | 98.23 | 97.71 | 99.44 | 99.75 | 94.88 | |
| 5-miRNAs | Training | 0.779 | 82.53 | 89.47 | 66.38 | 86.09 | 73.06 |
| Test | 0.782 | 82.70 | 89.41 | 66.95 | 86.40 | 72.92 |
AUC area under the curve, ACC accuracy, SPE specificity, SEN sensitivity, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value