Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 22;409(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03290-3

Table 2.

Correlation between the characteristics of each anastomotic technique and the rate of AL

Suture characteristics Leak p-value
Hand-sewn anastomosis group

Barbed (n = 40)

Non-braided (n = 24)

4 (10%)

6 (25%)

0.110
Circular stapled anastomosis group

Manual (n = 2)

Purse string device (n = 69)

Stapler diameter (25 mm) (n = 69)

Stapler diameter (29 mm) (n = 2)

0 (0%)

3 (4.3%)

3 (4.3%)

0 (0%)

0.763

0.763

Linear stapled anastomosis group

Stapler type (mechanical) (n = 29)

Stapler type (electric) (n = 66)

Stapler length (45 mm) (n = 37)

Stapler length (60 mm) (n = 5 8)

Layer of defect closing (single) (n = 43)

Layer of defect closing (double) (n = 52)

Suture thread for defect closing (barbed) (n = 55)

Suture thread for defect closing (braided) (n = 3)

Suture thread for defect closing (non-braided) (n = 37)

0 (0%)

6 (9.1%)

1 (2.7%)

5 (8.6%)

2 (4.6%)

4 (7.7%)

4 (7.3%)

1 (33.3%)

1 (2.7%)

0.093

0.248

0.544

0.1