Table 2.
Predictive capacity and consistency of individual prediction models for the depletion of GSH with 4 different incubation conditions
| Solvent | Test chemicals | Cut-off (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | Consistency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetonitrile | 15-fold | ≥ 8.5 | 76.2 (16/21) | 87.0 (20/23) | 81.8 (36/44) | 90.9 (40/44) |
| 10-fold | ≥ 6.0 | 90.5 (19/21) | 91.3 (21/23) | 90.9 (40/44) | 72.7 (32/44) | |
| DMSO | 15-fold | ≥ 8.7 | 90.5 (19/21) | 82.6 (19/23) | 86.4 (38/44) | 90.9 (40/44) |
| 10-fold | ≥ 5.8 | 95.2 (20/21) | 91.3 (21/23) | 93.2 (41/44) | 93.2 (41/44) |
The cut-off values were determined by analyzing corresponding receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. To determine the cut-off value for these prediction models, total three results of each trial were subjected to ROC analysis. Optimal cut-off values were obtained by plotting true positive values (sensitivity) in y-axis against false positive values (1-specificity) in x-axis. The value that provided the highest Youden index and the point with the lowest distance to the upper-left corner of the ROC curve was chosen as the best cut-off value