Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 13;12(1):40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.001

Table 4.

Univariate analysis of incontinence

Unmatched cohort
PSM cohort
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
TFL (vs. HL) 1.44 1.052–1.953 0.021 0.765 0.483–1.204 0.249
Age 1.013 0.995–1.031 0.169 1.031 1–1.063 0.049
Prostate volume (vs. 80–100 ml)
 101–200 ml 1.221 0.86–1.769 0.277 1.702 0.705–5.076 0.281
 >200 ml 1.251 0.713–2.143 0.422 2.277 0.764–7.733 0.156
Preoperative indwelling catheter 1.949 1.402–2.681 <0.001 1.437 0.692–2.798 0.305
Preoperative IPSS 0.97 0.94–1.001 0.057 0.984 0.91–1.061 0.671
Preoperative Qmax 0.871 0.815–0.929 <0.001 0.846 0.774–0.92 <0.001
Preoperative PVR 1.005 1.003–1.006 <0.001 1.005 1.003–1.008 <0.001
Enucleation type (vs. 3-lobe)
 2-lobe 0.518 0.337–0.805 0.003 0.466 0.253–0.877 0.016
 En-bloc 0.414 0.279–0.624 <0.001 0.821 0.44–1.56 0.539
Early apical release 0.882 0.65–1.21 0.429 1.711 1.072–2.778 0.026
Total operation time 1.01 1.006–1.013 <0.001 1.012 1.007–1.018 <0.001

HL, holmium laser; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; PSM; propensity score matched; PVR, post-void residual urine volume; Qmax, peak flow rate; QoL, quality of life score; SD, standard deviation; TFL, thulium fiber laser.