Table 5.
Forest plot of sugar intake.
| Odds Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study or Subgroup | Log (OR) |
SE | Weight | IV, Random, 95 % CI | IV, Random, 95 % CI |
| Dye et al. (2004) | 2.76 | 0.7908 | 2.0 % | 15.80 [3.35, 74.44] | ![]() |
| Felden et al. (2018) | 1.19 | 0.1122 | 39.5 | 3.29 [2.64, 4.10] | |
| Pacey et al. (2010) | 1.11 | 0.0459 | 58.6 | 3.03 [2.77, 3.23] | |
| Total 95 % CI | 100.0 % |
3.24 [2.59, 4.03] |
|||
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.02; Chi2 = 4.72, df = 2 (P = 0.09); I2 = 58 %.
Test for overall effect: Z = 10.42 (P < 0.00001).
