Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Author, year, and country | Study objectives | Population and sample size | Research focus or technological models | Design | Outcomes related to self-efficacy | Findings |
| Chang et al, 2022 [34], Taiwan | To enable students to learn and think deeply by interacting with a chatbot in the context of handling obstetric vaccine cases |
|
Nursing procedures or chatbot applying natural language processing | Nonrandomized controlled trial with quantitative and qualitative approach | Self-efficacy questionnaire based on Pintrich et al [42]. Individual interviews to investigate students’ perceived self-efficacy | Qualitative and quantitative data indicate that applying the mobile chatbot as a learning strategy enhanced nursing students’ self-efficacy |
| Egilsdottir et al, 2023 [39], Norway | To explore changes in nursing competence, factors associated with changes after clinical rotations, and whether an SMLTd supports changes in the confident use of B-PASe |
|
B-PAS or SMLT | Quantitative cohort study | Study-specific questionnaire to investigate students’ confidence in performing physical assessments | After the clinical rotation, both student groups reported changes in the confidence in performing B-PAS, with statistically significant moderate or large changes in all areas. Confidence in performing B-PAS, the usefulness of the SMLT, and a higher nursing competence at the start of clinical rotation were positively associated with overall nursing competence |
| Kim and Suh, 2018 [41], South Korea | To evaluate the effect on nursing students of an ICNSf mobile app |
|
Simulation of nursing procedures or ICNS app | Randomized controlled trial | SECPg instrument | The ICNS app enhanced students’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and nursing skills performance. The EG showed significantly more improved self-efficacy from before to after the intervention than the CG |
| Lee and Park, 2018 [37], South Korea | To examine the effect of flipped learning compared to traditional learning in a surgical nursing practicum |
|
Clinical practice in surgical nursing or flipped learning with e-learning content with smart learning tool | Two-arm, parallel, stratified group randomized trial | SECP instrument | Both groups showed improvement on all subscales of the SECP in the posttest, but no statistically significant differences were found between the group |
| Strandell-Laine et al, 2018 [40], Finland |
To evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile cooperation intervention in improving students’ competence and self-efficacy and the quality of the CLEh |
|
Clinical practice or mobile app | Randomized controlled trial | SECP instrument | The results of overall competence, self-efficacy, and overall satisfaction with the CLE showed no significant differences between the groups |
| Wang et al, 2022 [38], China | To examine the effects of a mobile phone–based psychological intervention program on stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students during clinical practice |
|
Psychological intervention or mobile phone–based | Randomized controlled trial | General Self-Efficacy Scale | More significant improvements in stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy as well as more significant improvement in group-interaction time were observed in the EG than in the CG |
| Wang et al, 2023 [36], China | To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an online 5-week professional identity program among nursing students in clinical internship practice during COVID-19 restrictions |
|
Professional identity or online program | Two-armed randomized controlled trial with quantitative and qualitative approach | Professional self-efficacy questionnaire for nursing students | For professional self-efficacy, the group effect, time effect, and group-by-time effect were not significant except for 1 factor related to the capacity for information collection and planning. Students stated that the program enhanced their professional belief, and they felt less stressed in adapting to the stressful atmosphere. The facilitator supported the participants’ experiences of internal self-motivation that led to active participation in the program. Building mutual trust and familiarity was essential for the group dynamic |
| Wu and Sung, 2014 [35], Taiwan | To assess the advantages of mobile devices and cloud learning in a public health practice course using Google+ as the learning platform and integrating various application tools |
|
Clinical practice in public health or Google+ as a learning management system | Nonrandomized pilot study with quantitative and qualitative approach | Computer self-efficacy instrument designed by Compeau and Higgins [43] | Most students had past computer experience and often searched for information on the internet. They were confident in computer use and displayed high self-efficacy. The analysis of learning effectiveness showed that students using Google+ had greater learning effectiveness than did those adopting traditional learning |
aEG: experimental group.
bCG: control group.
cNR: not reported.
dSMLT: suite of mobile learning tools.
eB-PAS: basic physical assessment skills.
fICNS: interactive clinical nursing skills.
gSECP: Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance.
hCLE: clinical learning environment.