Table 2.
Advantages and disadvantages of different methods of 3D bioprinting
| Methods of 3D bioprinting | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Inkjet bioprinting | High print speed | Low cell viscosity and density |
| High resolution | Relatively low cell viability | |
| Cost-effective technique | Poor mechanical properties | |
| Cell printing ability | Only create simple structures | |
| FDM | No solvents | Poor mechanical properties |
| Low cost | Layer-by-layer appearance | |
| High print speed | Poor surface properties | |
| Simple and continuous production | Limited thermoplastic polymer | |
| Clean material and less pollution | High temperature damage cell | |
| Poor cell printing ability | ||
| SLA | Create highly complex geometrical features | Limitation on bioink |
| No limitation on cell viscosity | Damage to cells during photocuring | |
| No nozzle clogging problems | High cost | |
| High concentration of cells | Low print speed | |
| High speed and resolution | ||
| High surface quality | ||
| Micro-extrusion bioprinting | No limitation on bioink | Poor pressure-based systems |
| High cell viability | ||
| High print speed | ||
| Print very high cell density models | ||
| 3D bioplotting | High accuracy | Low cell adhesion |
3D: Three-dimensional; FDM: fused deposition modelling; SLA: stereolithography.