Abstract
Objective
To assess the pattern of clinical presentations and factors associated with the management outcome of pediatric intussusception among children treated at Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.
Methods
This retrospective cross-sectional study included the medical records of 103 children treated for intussusception from 2018 to 2020. The data collected were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
In total, 84 (81.6%) patients were released with a favorable outcome. Ileocolic intussusception was a positive predictor, with a nine-fold higher likelihood of a favorable outcome than other types of intussusception [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 9.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.39–21.2]. Additionally, a favorable outcome was three times more likely in patients who did than did not undergo manual reduction (AOR, 3.08; 95% CI, 3.05–5.48). Patients aged <1 year were 96% less likely to have a positive outcome than those aged >4 years (AOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03–0.57).
Conclusion
Most patients were discharged with favorable outcomes. Having ileocolic intussusception and undergoing manual reduction were associated with significantly more favorable outcomes of pediatric intussusception. Therefore, nonsurgical management such as hydrostatic enema and pneumatic reduction is recommended to reduce hospital discharge of patients with unfavorable outcomes.
Keywords: Intussusception, pediatric, clinical presentation, management outcome, Ethiopia, nonsurgical management
Introduction
In the pediatric population, acute intussusception is one main cause of abdominal surgical emergencies such as severe intestinal obstruction and abdominal pain.1,2 Following appendicitis, acute intussusception is the second most common cause of acute abdomen in children and the most common cause of small bowel obstruction in young infants. 3 Acute intussusception occurs worldwide with an incidence of approximately 1 to 4 in 2000 infants and children. It can be seen in children of all ages, but 75% of cases occur within the first 2 years of life and 90% occur within 3 years of life. The occurrence rate is highest between 4 and 8 months of age. 4
Intussusception was first described by Paul Barbette in 1674, 5 and the Scottish surgeon James Hunter then coined the term “intussusception” in 1793. 6 Intussusception is defined as the movement of a proximal bowel segment into a distal bowel segment. The associated mesentery is dragged within the invaginated part, leading to venous congestion and edema. This results in ischemia and eventually bowel necrosis, perforation, and peritonitis if left untreated. 3 The classic clinical triad of Ombredanne consists of intermittent abdominal pain, red currant jelly stool, and a sausage-shaped abdominal mass. 7
Many children with intussusception present late for definitive treatment, and this seems to be the norm in developing countries. 8 Studies in Uganda 9 and Kenya 10 showed that this duration was 4.5 and 4.4 days, respectively, and the median duration of symptoms in referred and non-referred patients was 4 days and 2 days, respectively. In Ethiopia, 80% of patients visit the hospital after 2 days of illness. One study showed that the mean duration of symptoms before presentation to the hospital was 5.2 days (range, 1–21 days). 2 Reports from Nigeria showed that 46.3% of patients required bowel resection and that nine (23.1%) patients died, and these deaths were directly related to intussusception occurring in patients who presented after 24 hours.11–13
In another study, most patients (89%) were <2 years old, and 78% presented at the age of 3 to 18 months. Only 11% of patients presented after 2 years of age, and the age at presentation was significantly lower in Black African patients. 8 Intussusception also occurs more commonly in male than in female patients, with a ratio of 2:1 or 3:2.9,10 In a study in Nigeria, most affected patients were aged 3 to 9 months, with peak incidence at 6 months.14–17 In one of the above-mentioned studies, a radiographic modality was used to diagnose intussusception in >95% of patients in all regions except Africa, where clinical findings or surgery were used in 65% of the patients. 2 In other research, the diagnosis of intussusception was mainly clinical in 71.4% of patients. 18
The suggested treatment modality for acute intussusception is surgery or nonsurgical therapies such as hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction under fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance. 4 In developing countries, a higher rate of patients undergo surgical treatment, which has higher complication and mortality rates because late presentation commonly occurs in these regions.9,10,18
Although pediatric intussusception is a standard pediatric surgical emergency with considerable morbidity and mortality, data in Ethiopia seem to be insufficient. Therefore, the present study was performed to examine the pattern of clinical presentations, morbidity, and mortality associated with pediatric intussusception at Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (WSUCSH).
Methodology
Study setting and period
In this study, children diagnosed and treated for acute intussusception from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The study was conducted from 1 to 30 November 2021 in WSUCSH, which is located in Wolaita Zone, 329 km from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia’s capital. This hospital serves as a teaching institution for health science students and residents and provides 24-hour comprehensive services for a population of more than 5.8 million people with different demographic and socioeconomic backgrounds from the entire surrounding area of the southern part of the country. It offers general surgery, internal medicine, neurology, orthopedics, neurosurgery, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, radiology, dermatology, pathology, oncology, anesthesiology, and neonatal care specialty services for the entire population of eastern Ethiopia. The Department of Pediatrics has six units: the pediatric ward, pediatric intensive care unit, neonatal resuscitation unit, neonatal intensive care unit, outpatient department, and chronic follow-up unit.
Study design and population
This retrospective cross-sectional study included all medical records of children admitted and treated for acute intussusception at WSUCSH from January 2018 to December 2020. Medical records with missing data and uncertain treatment outcomes were excluded from the study. The reporting of this study conforms to the STROBE guidelines. 19
Sample size and sampling techniques
The study sample comprised pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment of intussusception. The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula based on the findings of the Jimma University Medical Center study, 20 with a p value of 0.157 and calculation of the 95% confidence interval (CI). Odds ratios (ORs) and Z-scores (Z = 1.962) were also considered, resulting in an initial sample size of 203. After applying the finite population correction, the final calculated sample size was adjusted to 128. We included all patients who underwent an operation for intussusception.
Dependent variable
The dependent variable in this study was the surgical management outcome of pediatric intussusception (favorable or unfavorable).
Measurements/operational definitions
Cure: Telescoping of the bowel has been resolved and the patient is no longer experiencing symptoms
Recurrence: Symptoms reappear after successful treatment
Failure of treatment: Symptoms reappear or worsen after repeated nonsurgical treatment attempts
Positive/favorable outcome: Patient has been cured of intussusception and is discharged from the hospital
Negative/unfavorable outcome: Patients discontinue treatment against medical advice, develop in-hospital recurrence or failure of treatment, or die after discharge
Diagnosis of intussusception
The initial diagnostic criterion was the clinical triad of abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea/stool, and a palpable abdominal mass. However, abdominal ultrasonography findings such as a target sign, pseudo kidney, or doughnut sign were used for patients who did not exhibit the classic triad and did not require urgent surgical intervention, such as patients with peritonitis. The findings of the clinical triad and/or ultrasonography were confirmed by intraoperative identification of the intussusception.
Data collection tools and methods
Data were collected using a validated pretested structured data extraction checklist adopted from relevant literature and modified to the study variables. First, the surgical and admission records were reviewed to develop a list of patients presenting with acute intussusception from January 2018 to December 2020. Next, data were extracted from the medical records of children taken from the examination room upon arrival, operating room records, postsurgical evaluation and monitoring sheets, intensive care records, and discharge records. Data were collected by trained data collectors and supervisors. Additional data collected included sociodemographic characteristics, delay in presentation, clinical signs and symptoms, interventions, surgical procedures, and the duration of hospitalization.
To avoid selection bias, we included all patients who underwent surgical operations for intussusception.
Data quality management
We used a pretested, validated, structured data collection tool prepared in simple English after a review of the related literature to ensure data quality. The data collectors and supervisors received 1 day of training on the purpose of the study, the contents of the data collection tools, where to find the records, how to extract the required data from the medical records, and how to appropriately record the data. A pretest was conducted on 5% of the sample before the actual data collection period to assess the reliability and validity of the data collection tools. The questionnaires were reviewed and checked for completeness, accuracy, and consistency by the principal investigator and amended accordingly based on the pretest results. The supervisors and the principal investigator carefully checked the collected data for completeness, accuracy, and consistency daily. Two individuals performed double data entry to minimize errors.
Data processing and analysis
The collected data were validated for completeness and accuracy. They were then categorized, coded, and entered into EpiData version 3.1 (EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) and analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were used for the frequency, mean and median, standard deviation, and percentage. The results were summarized using graphs, charts, and tables, and data interpretations were based on the main objectives of the study. Variables with a p-value of <0.25 at a 95% CI were candidates for the final multivariate logistic regression. The features included in the final model were the length of hospital stay, age, sex, residence, abdominal distension, eagerness to drink, type of intussusception, sunken eyes, and the operative procedure performed. Logistic regression analyses were utilized, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the Institutional Research Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia (Certificate Ref. No: CHSM/ERC/02/2014). A written official letter of cooperation was submitted to WSUCSH before the commencement of data collection. Informed consent was voluntarily provided by the heads of the hospital and the department after they had been informed of the aim, purpose, and benefits of the study. The confidentiality of the information was maintained throughout the data collection and information dissemination process. We also de-identified all patient details in the chart review. Because of the anonymous nature of the data analysis, the requirement for informed consent from the patients’ guardians was waived by the ethics committee.
Results
Patients’ sociodemographic characteristics
Among 128 eligible patients, we excluded 25 (19.5%) because of incomplete records. Therefore, the study included the remaining 103 (80.5%) patients. Of these 103 patients, 68 (66%) were male and 43 (42%) were aged <1 year (minimum age, 2 months; mean age, 3.55 ± 3.62 months). Ninety-two (89%) patients resided in rural areas.
Clinical presentations and findings
Seventy-six (74%) patients visited our hospital through a referral from another health institution. The clinical presentations included abdominal pain in 75 (72.8%) patients, vomiting in 83 (80.6%), abdominal tenderness in 36 (35.0%), bloody stool in 53 (51.5%), a rectal mass in 61 (59.2%), and a gangrenous bowel condition in 30 (29.1%). In terms of the diagnostic method, 64 (62.1%) of the patients were diagnosed clinically, and 39 (37.9%) were diagnosed by ultrasound. Most patients [60 (58.3%)] had a >3-day history of symptoms at presentation. The key clinical manifestations and findings are shown in detail in Table 1.
Table 1.
Clinical presentations and findings according to the patterns of clinical presentations and management outcomes of pediatric intussusception at Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (n = 103).
| Variables | Categories | n | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Means of visit to the hospital | Referred from health institution | 76 | 73.8 |
| Self-referred | 27 | 26.2 | |
| Abdominal pain | Yes | 75 | 72.8 |
| No | 28 | 27.2 | |
| Bloody stool | Yes | 53 | 51.5 |
| No | 50 | 48.5 | |
| Vomiting | Yes | 83 | 80.6 |
| No | 20 | 19.4 | |
| Abdominal distension | Yes | 18 | 17.5 |
| No | 85 | 82.5 | |
| Duration of symptoms | ≤24 hours | 10 | 9.7 |
| 25–48 hours | 16 | 15.5 | |
| 48–72 hours | 17 | 16.5 | |
| >72 hours | 60 | 58.3 | |
| Tachycardia | Yes | 93 | 90.3 |
| No | 10 | 9.7 | |
| Fever | Yes | 19 | 18.4 |
| No | 84 | 81.6 | |
| Tachypnea | Yes | 20 | 19.4 |
| No | 83 | 80.6 | |
| Delayed capillary refill time | Yes | 26 | 25.2 |
| No | 77 | 74.8 | |
| Eager to drink | Yes | 24 | 23.3 |
| No | 79 | 76.7 | |
| Irritable | Yes | 36 | 35.0 |
| No | 67 | 65.0 | |
| Lethargy | Yes | 16 | 15.5 |
| No | 87 | 84.5 | |
| Sunken eyes | Yes | 51 | 49.5 |
| No | 52 | 50.5 | |
| Rectal mass | Yes | 61 | 59.2 |
| No | 42 | 40.8 | |
| Abdominal tenderness | Yes | 36 | 35.0 |
| No | 67 | 65.0 | |
| Diagnosis | Clinical | 64 | 62.1 |
| Imaging (ultrasonography) | 39 | 37.9 | |
| Blood transfusion | Yes | 13 | 12.6 |
| No | 90 | 87.4 | |
| Bowel condition | Viable | 62 | 60.2 |
| Gangrenous | 30 | 29.1 | |
| Perforated | 4 | 3.9 | |
| Gangrenous and perforated | 7 | 6.8 |
Intraoperative findings and management outcomes
Table 2 presents the intraoperative findings and management outcomes. A pathological lead point was found in 16 (15.5%) patients. Among these 16 patients, the lead points were a lymph node in 7 (43.75%), Meckel’s diverticulum in 2 (12.5%), duplication cyst in 3 (18.75%), and other sites in 4 (25.0%) (Figure 1).
Table 2.
Intraoperative findings and management outcomes according to patterns of clinical presentations and management outcomes of pediatric intussusception at Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (n = 103).
| Variables | Categories | n | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathological lead point | Yes | 16 | 15.5 |
| No | 87 | 84.5 | |
| Operative procedure performed | Manual reduction | 56 | 54.4 |
| Resection and anastomosis | 47 | 45.6 | |
| Patient transferred to | PACU | 72 | 69.9 |
| ICU | 31 | 30.1 | |
| Patient condition at discharge | Discharged improved | 84 | 81.6 |
| Left against medical advice | 6 | 5.8 | |
| Died | 13 | 12.6 | |
| Surgical site infection | Yes | 13 | 12.6 |
| No | 90 | 87.4 | |
| Wound dehiscence | Yes | 6 | 5.8 |
| No | 97 | 94.2 | |
| Postoperative complication | Yes | 5 | 4.9 |
| No | 98 | 95.1 | |
| Hospital-acquired infection | Yes | 15 | 14.6 |
| No | 88 | 85.4 | |
| Length of hospital stay | ≤4 days | 26 | 25.2 |
| 4.1–6 days | 20 | 19.4 | |
| 6.1–11 days | 31 | 30.1 | |
| >11 days | 26 | 25.2 |
PACU, post-anesthesia care unit; ICU, intensive care unit
Figure 1.
Exploration of the type of lead point among patients according to the patterns of clinical presentations and management outcomes of pediatric intussusception.
The most common operative procedure was manual reduction, which was performed in 54.4% of the patients. Resection and anastomosis were also common, performed in 47 (45.6%) patients. Resection and anastomosis were performed because of gangrenous bowel attributable to delayed presentation in most cases, and bowel perforation occurred during manual reduction in some patients. Many patients [31 (30.1%)] were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) either at Wolaita Sodo Teaching and Referral Hospital or at the study site. The length of hospital stay was >11 days in 25% of patients, ranging from 1 to 25 days (mean, 8.01 ± 5.39 days). Surgical site infection occurred in 13 (12.6%) patients, and hospital-acquired infection occurred in 15 (14.6%). Upon discharge, 84 (81.6%) patients showed improvement, 6 (5.8%) left against medical advice, and 13 (12.6%) died. The cause of death in most of these patients was sepsis related to gangrenous bowel, bowel perforation, and late presentation.
The most common types of intussusception based on the intraoperative findings were ileocolocolic in 40 (38.83%) patients, ileocolic in 27 (26.26%), ileoileal in 26 (25.24%), and colocolic in 10 (9.71%). These findings are diagrammatically depicted in Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Anatomic classification of intussusception according to the patterns of clinical presentations and management outcomes of pediatric intussusception at Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.
Predictors of pediatric intussusception management outcomes
To conduct an appropriate logistic regression analysis, the outcome variable was dichotomized into two groups: patients discharged with improvement (positive outcome), constituting 81.6% of all patients, and patients who left against medical advice or died (merged and categorized as patients with an unfavorable outcome) (negative outcome), constituting 18.4% of all patients. This indicates that most of the patients were discharged with favorable outcomes following management of pediatric intussusception at WSUCSH. However, a substantial number of patients were discharged with negative outcomes.
Of the variables included in the final model, the following were identified as predictors of the outcome after controlling for likely confounders: patient age, type of intussusception, and operative procedure. Patients aged <1 year were 96% less likely to have positive outcomes than those aged >4 years [adjusted AOR (AOR), 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03–0.57]. The type of intussusception was also a predictor, and the ileocolic type was associated with a nine-times higher likelihood of having favorable outcomes (AOR, 9.16; 95% CI, 2.39–21.2). Compared with other operative procedures, manual reduction was associated with a three-times higher likelihood of a positive outcome (AOR, 3.08; 95% CI, 3.05–5.48) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Factors associated with management outcomes of pediatric intussusception at Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.
| Variables | Categories | Outcome |
COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | ||||
| Length of hospital stay | ≤4 days | 17 (20.2%) | 9 (47.4%) | 1.26 (0.88–3.42) | 0.16 (0.08–2.12) |
| 4.1–6 days | 17 (20.2%) | 3 (15.8%) | 4.21 (0.99–8.98) | 3.2 (0.19–7.68) | |
| 6.1–11 days | 28 (33.3%) | 3 (15.8%) | 4.22 (0.89–5.77) | 3.72 (0.39–8.56) | |
| >11 days | 22 (26.2%) | 4 (21.1%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Age | ≤1 year | 31 (36.9%) | 12 (63.2%) | 0.34 (0.13–0.79) | 0.04 (0.03–0.57) * |
| 1–4 years | 18 (21.4%) | 3 (15.8%) | 0.46 (0.043–6.42) | 0.56 (0.03–8.22) | |
| ≥4 years | 35 (41.7%) | 4 (21.1%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Sex | Male | 54 (64.3%) | 14 (73.7%) | 0.19 (0.18–2.22) | 0.11 (0.08–1.32) |
| Female | 30 (35.7%) | 5 (26.3%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Residence | Rural | 74 (88.1%) | 18 (94.7%) | 0.50 (0.12–6.01) | 0.41 (0.02–9.02) |
| Urban | 10 (11.9%) | 1 (5.3%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Abdominal distension | Yes | 62 (73.8%) | 13 (68.4%) | 0.33 (0.11–11.21) | 1.93 (0.29–13.41) |
| No | 22 (26.2%) | 6 (31.6%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Eager to drink | Yes | 22 (26.2%) | 2 (10.5%) | 3.09 (1.66–6.11) | 3.14 (1.76–8.51) |
| No | 62 (73.8%) | 17 (89.5%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Type of intussusception | Ileoileal | 23 (27.4%) | 3 (15.8%) | 2.12 (1.22–9.07) | 3.91 (1.11–11.17) |
| Ileocolic | 26 (31.0%) | 1 (5.3%) | 8.26 (1.19–11.01) | 9.16 (2.39–21.2) * | |
| Colocolic | 8 (9.5%) | 2 (10.5%) | 5.12 (0.14–11.22) | 4.72 (0.54–10.18) | |
| Ileocolocolic | 27 (32.1%) | 13 (68.4%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Sunken eyes | Yes | 37 (44.0%) | 14 (73.7%) | 1.17 (0.51–2.19) | 0.07 (0.05–1.15) |
| No | 47 (56.0%) | 5 (26.3%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Operative procedure | Manual reduction | 54 (64.3%) | 2 (10.5%) | 2.11 (1.09–5.98) | 3.08 (3.05–5.48) * |
| Resection and anastomosis | 30 (35.7%) | 17 (89.5%) | 1 | 1 | |
COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Statistically significant association.
Discussion
Pediatric abdominal surgery emergencies occur worldwide, necessitating prompt diagnosis and treatment. 2 Acute intussusception is considered more prevalent in children aged <2 years, particularly in infants aged 4 to 9 months.21–23 Nevertheless, 43 (41.7%) patients in our study were infants aged <1 year, 39 (37.9%) were >4 years old, and 21 (20.4%) were 1 to 4 years old. This suggests that attention should also be paid to the occurrence of intussusception in older children. The highest incidence among infants in our study is in agreement with many studies both worldwide and in Africa.24–28 Shiyi and Ganapathy 29 found that approximately 10% of intussusceptions occur in children aged >5 years, 3% to 4% occur in children aged >10 years, and 1% occur in infants aged <3 months. In one case series, 30 children aged >3 and >5 years accounted for 36.1% and 9.5% of the patients with intussusception, respectively, supporting our findings of a higher incidence among children aged >4 years. Male patients were more commonly affected than female patients in this study, with a male:female ratio of 1.94:1.00; this is also comparable to the results reported by other researchers.3,25,26,31 However, the specific cause of these age and sex variances remain unknown. In our study, more than 89% of the patients came from rural areas located a considerable distance from the study area, which is consistent with other studies.3,27,32
Intussusception manifests as paroxysmal stomach pain/crying, an abdominal sausage-shaped mass, and bloody stool. In the present study, the clinical presentations included bloody stool in 53 (51.5%) patients, abdominal pain in 75 (72.8%), vomiting in 83 (80.6%), and a rectal mass in 61 (59.2%). This is consistent with research conducted in South Africa showing that >90% of patients presented with vomiting and bloody stool, 60% with a palpable mass, and >30% with a mass palpable on rectal examination or presenting at the anus.33,34 Notably, the incidence of bloody stool was lower in our study than in these studies from South Africa.33,34 Justice et al. 35 reported that 78% of the children in their study presented with abdominal pain, lethargy, and vomiting, which is in agreement with our study. However, other studies have suggested that the patterns of symptoms may vary depending on the age and sex of the child 36 and the duration of signs upon presentation to the hospital. A significant number of children with intussusception present for definitive treatment late in the clinical course, and this seems to be the norm in many developing countries. 18 Our study showed that most of the patients [60 (58.3%)] had a >3-day history of symptoms at presentation, which is consistent with the literature from developing countries.2,9,10 The reason for late presentation may be the need to travel long distances, potentially from rural areas. Ninety-two (89.3%) of our patients were from a rural area, and most such patients seeking public health care have limited access to transport. The presentation of intussusception is similar to many common abdominal and respiratory tract infections in children. Intussusception is clinically or surgically diagnosed in most patients in developing countries, which is consistent with the higher percentage of clinical diagnoses [64 (62.1%)] than ultrasound-based diagnoses [39 (37.9%)] in our study.
The suggested treatment modality for acute intussusception is surgery or nonsurgical therapies such as hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction under fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance. 4 The most common operative procedure in our study was manual reduction, performed in 54.4% of the patients; resection and anastomosis were also commonly performed [47 (45.6%) patients]. This finding suggests a growing diagnostic and interventional shift in intussusception management from surgical to nonsurgical reduction. 33 Non-operative reduction using hydrostatic or pneumatic pressure by enema is the treatment of choice for an infant or child who is clinically stable and has no evidence of bowel perforation or shock when appropriate radiologic facilities are available. Because of the increased availability of diagnostic modalities among many institutions and the advancements in medical specialties, non-operative reduction currently predominates globally. This is also augmented by increased health-seeking behavior and early presentation to health facilities, which reduces the complications associated with resection and anastomosis. Our findings are consistent with this explanation because most of our patients were managed by surgical means.
It should be noted that the current findings contradict data from Tikur Anbesa Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia,37,38 Jimma University Medical Centre in Ethiopia, 19 and Tanzania, 3 where surgery is used for management of most patients. These differences may be due to patients’ early health-seeking behavior, considerable immediate and late surgical complications, and higher proportion of viable bowel [62 (60.2%) patients in the present study]. Surgical intervention is indicated when there is evidence of bowel necrosis, bowel perforation, or peritonitis; when safe facilities to perform an enema reduction are unavailable; or when repeated relapse occurs despite appropriate management. Most studies have shown that late presentation in developing countries is closely associated with surgical treatment and complications.33,39,40
Intraoperative findings revealed pathological lead points in 16 (15.5%) patients in our study. The lead points were a lymph node in 7 (6.8%) patients, Meckel’s diverticulum in 2 (1.9%), a duplication cyst in 3 (2.9%), and other sites in 4 (3.9%). This incidence of 15.5% is higher than in a study from South Africa, which showed a 2% incidence of lead points, 4 as well as another study showing lead points in 1.5% to 12.0% of cases. 41 Open surgery was performed in our study, and 47 (45.6%) patients underwent resection and anastomosis procedures. This proportion of patients is less than that in a Tanzanian study, in which 55% of patients underwent intestinal resection, 42 but higher than the proportions of 33% and 39% reported in Kenya and Tanzania, 43 respectively. The higher rate of bowel resection in our study is attributed to the patients’ late presentation, which reflects the low level of health awareness in our community; infrastructural problems associated with the high proportion of patients in rural areas; and similarity of symptoms with other common pediatric conditions.
Postoperative complications are associated with poor treatment results in patients with acute intussusception. 44 The most common postoperative complication is hospital-acquired infection, which occurred in 15 (14.6%) patients in our study. Hospital-acquired infection is associated with the length of hospital stay, which was >11 days in 25% of our patients (range, 1–25 days; mean, 8.01 ± 5.39 days). Surgical site infection occurred in 13 (12.6%) patients, which is a lower incidence than in studies performed in Ethiopia (21.3% and 33.9%)45,46 and Tanzania (42.9%). 3 The ICU admission rate in our study was 30.1%. Another study showed that bowel resection was also associated with ICU admission (p < 0.001) and prolonged hospitalization (p < 0.001). 3 This helps to explain the reasons for the ICU admissions in our setting. Critically ill patients with conditions such as intestinal gangrene, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and multiple organ dysfunction are more likely to be admitted to the ICU. 43 Our mortality rate was 12.6%, which is consistent with the mortality rate of 14.3% in the study from Tanzania. 3 The mortality rate in Africa (9%) was higher than that in other regions (˂1%),2,3,7 which is in agreement with our findings and can be explained by late presentations, open surgical procedures, postoperative complications, and poor infrastructure in the developing world, unlike more developed countries with lower mortality rates. Patients aged <1 year were 96% less likely to have positive outcomes than those aged >4 years (AOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.03–0.57). This is because younger patients have a higher probability of requiring bowel resection than older patients. This is consistent with other studies showing that an age of <1 year was more strongly associated with bowel resection and associated complications. An age of <1 year was shown to have a 2.7-times higher risk of bowel obstruction than older ages. 47 A study in in Nigeria showed that children aged <1 year were three times more likely than those aged >1 year to require bowel resection. This might be explained by the fact that infants are more prone to developing shock, which may further compromise the already precarious blood supply to the intussusception. 48 The type of intussusception was also a predictor, and the ileocolic type had a nine-times higher likelihood of favorable outcomes in our study (AOR, 9.16; 95% CI, 2.39–21.2). The most common form of intussusception in our study was ileocolic, which is in agreement with other studies.45,48 The more favorable outcomes of this type are indicated by its clinical and ultrasound presentations.49,50 Additionally, manual reduction had a three-times higher likelihood of a positive outcome than other procedures (AOR, 3.08; 95% CI, 3.05–5.48). This is also in agreement with many other studies.23,51,52
Limitations
This study involved a retrospective record review, which has inherent limitations. The secondary data in this study might not have specifically addressed the research questions or contained the information required for analysis. Another limitation was the small sample size. Moreover, the retrospective cross-sectional study design did not allow for easy establishment of the cause–effect relationship between the study variables or other statistical inferences. The findings of this institutional study are difficult to generalize to other populations.
Conclusion
This study revealed a higher prevalence of patients with favorable than unfavorable outcomes. An ileocolic intussusception and manual reduction appear to be associated with more favorable outcomes. Although the number of pediatric surgeons in Ethiopia is gradually increasing, this country requires improved facilities, referral networks, and patient transportation to enhance outcomes. To enhance early diagnosis and attain outcomes comparable to those achieved in high-income nations, it is essential to improve population-level education and provide comprehensive training for primary healthcare workers. Additionally, optimizing referral pathways from primary healthcare settings is crucial.
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our gratitude to the data collectors who extracted the data from the chart review and to the study supervisors. We would also like to thank WSUCSH and Wolaita Sodo University for providing permission to use all provided documents in this research.
Author contributions: YZ: Conceived the study and drafted the manuscript. TB, AD, AW, and MM: Study design and methodology, data analysis, writing of manuscript, and critical evaluation of manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript for submission to the journal.
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding: The authors received no funding for this research.
ORCID iD: Mengistu Meskele https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-4591
Data availability statement
The article contains all necessary data within the manuscript. The authors will provide the data upon request.
References
- 1.Bines JE, Kohl KS, Forster J, Brighton Collaboration Intussusception Working Group et al. Acute Intussusception in infants and children as an adverse event following immunization: case definition and guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation. Vaccine 2004; 22: 569–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jiang J, Jiang B, Parashar U, et al. Childhood intussusception: a literature review. PloS One 2013; 8: e68482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chalya PL, Kayange NM, Chandika AB. Childhood intussusceptions at a tertiary care hospital in northwestern Tanzania: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in resource-limited setting. Ital J Pediatr 2014; 40: 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carapinha C, Truter M, Bentley A, et al. Factors determining clinical outcomes in intussusception in the developing world: experience from Johannesburg, South Africa. S Afr Med J 2016; 106: 177–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barbette P. Ouevres chirurgiques et anatomiques. Francois Miege. Geneva: 1674, p.5221.
- 6.Hunter J. On introsusception. Trans Soc Improv Med Surg Knowledge 1793; 1: 103–118.
- 7.World Health Organization. Acute intussusception in infants and children: incidence, clinical representation and management: a global perspective. World Health Organization, 2002.
- 8.Moore SW, Kirsten M, Müller EW, et al. Retrospective surveillance of intussusception in South Africa, 1998–2003. J Infect Dis 2010; 202: S156–S161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Akello VV, Cheung M, Kurigamba G, et al. Pediatric intussusception in Uganda: differences in management and outcomes with high-income countries. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55: 530–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ooko P, Oloo M, Mwaka V, et al. Presentation and management outcome of children with intussusception at Tenwek Hospital, Kenya. East Cent Afr J Surg 2016; 21: 55–59. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Talabi AO, Sowande OA, Etonyeaku CA, et al. Childhood intussusception in Ile-ife: what has changed? Afr J Paediatr Surg 2013; 10: 239–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ekenze SO, Mgbor SO, Okwesili OR. Routine surgical intervention for childhood intussusception in a developing country. Ann Afr Med 2010; 9: 27–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chua JH, Chui CH, Jacobsen AS. Role of surgery in the era of highly successful air enema reduction of intussusception. Asian J Surg 2006; 29: 267–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tran LAT, Yoshida LM, Nakagomi T, et al. A high incidence of intussusception revealed by a retrospective hospital-based study in Nha Trang, Vietnam between 2009 and 2011. Trop Med Health 2013; 41: 121–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yousafzai MT, Thobani R, Qazi SH, et al. Intussusception among children less than 2 years of age: findings from pre-vaccine introduction surveillance in Pakistan. Vaccine 2018; 36: 7775–7779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Latipov R, Khudoyorov R, Flem E. Childhood intussusception in Uzbekistan: analysis of retrospective surveillance data. BMC Pediatr 2011; 11: 22–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abbas TO, AlShahwani N, Jabbour G, et al. Retrospective surveillance over 11 years for intussusception in children younger than 14 years in the state of Qatar. OJPed 2014; 04: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ogundoyin OO, Olulana DI, Lawal TA. Childhood intussusception: a prospective study of management trend in a developing country. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2015; 12: 217–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, STROBE Initiative et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 573–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yilma Y, Akmel M, Workicho A. A three-year study on childhood intussusception in Jimma University Medical Center. Med Pract Rev 2018; 9: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Loukas M, Pellerin M, Kimball Z, et al. Intussusception: an anatomical perspective with review of the literature. Clin Anat 2011; 24: 552–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Edwards EA, Pigg N, Courtier J, et al. Intussusception: past, present and future. Pediatr Radiol 2017; 47: 1101–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Applegate KE. Intussusception in children: evidence-based diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39: S140–S143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Usang UE, Inah GB, Inyang AW, et al. Intussusception in children: comparison between ultrasound diagnosis and operation findings in a tropical developing country. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2013; 10: 87–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Carneiro PM, Kisusi DM. Intussusception in children seen at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam. East Afr Med J 2004; 81: 439–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Buettcher M, Baer G, Bonhoeffer J, et al. Three-year surveillance of intussusception in children in Switzerland. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 473–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Awasthi S, Agarwal GG, Mishra V, et al. Four-country surveillance of intestinal intussusception and diarrhoea in children. J Paediatr Child Health 2009; 45: 82–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen YE, Beasley S, Grimwood K; New Zealand Rotavirus Study Group. Intussusception and rotavirus associated hospitalization in New Zealand. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90: 1077–1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shiyi EY, Ganapathy S. Intussusception in children presenting to the emergency department: an Asian perspective. Pediatr Emerg Care 2017; 33: 409–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li Y, Zhou Q, Liu C, et al. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment of children with acute intussusception: a case series. BMC Pediatr 2023; 23: 143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shapkina AN, Shapkin VV, Nelubov IV, et al. Intussusception in children: 11-year experience in Vladivostok. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22: 901–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Edino ST, Ochicha O, Mohammed AZ, et al. Intussusception in Kano: a 5-year analysis of pattern, morbidity and mortality. Niger J Med 2003; 12: 221–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cox S, Withers A, Arnold M, et al. Clinical presentation and management of childhood intussusception in South Africa. Pediatr Surg Int 2021; 37: 1361–1370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mpabalwani EM, Mwenda JM, Tate JE, et al. Review of naturally occurring intussusception in young children in the WHO African region prior to the era of rotavirus vaccine utilization in the expanded programme of immunization. J Trop Pediatr 2016; 63: fmw069–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Justice FA, Auldist AW, Bines JE. Intussusception: trends in clinical presentation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 842–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bartocci M, Fabrizi G, Valente I, et al. Intussusception in childhood: role of sonography on diagnosis and treatment. J Ultrasound 2015; 18: 205–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tadesse A, Teshager F, Weldegebriel G, et al. Epidemiology of intussusception among infants in Ethiopia, 2013-2016. Pan Afr Med J 2021; 39: 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Charles T, Penninga L, Reurings JC, et al. Intussusception in children: a clinical review. Acta Chir Belg 2015; 115: 327–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saxena A, Höllwarth M. Factors influencing management and comparison of outcomes in paediatric intussusceptions. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 1199–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ko SF, Lee TY, Ng SH, et al. Small bowel intussusception in symptomatic pediatric patients: experiences with 19 surgically proven cases. World J Surg 2002; 26: 438–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Waseem M, Rosenberg HK. Intussusception. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24: 793–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mbaga M, Msuya D, Mboma L, et al. Intussusception among infants in Tanzania: findings from prospective hospital-based surveillance, 2013-2016. Pan Afr Med J 2021; 39(Suppl 1): 4. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2021.39.1.21358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Giovanni JE, Hrapcak S, Melgar M, et al. Global reports of intussusception in infants with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2021; 40: e35–e36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Archibong AE, Usoro IN, Ikpi E, et al. Pediatric intussusception in Calabar, Nigeria. East Afr Med J 2001; 78: 19–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tesfaye DD, Adem BM, Ketema I, et al. Clinical profile and treatment outcome of acute intussusception among children in eastern Ethiopia: a seven years retrospective study. Front Pediatr 2022; 10: 968072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gadisa A, Tadesse A, Hailemariam B. Patterns and seasonal variation of intussusception in children: a retrospective analysis of cases operated in a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J 2016; 54: 9–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fallon SC, Lopez ME, Zhang W, et al. Risk factors for surgery in pediatric intussusception in the era of pneumatic reduction. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48: 1032–1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ajao AE, Lawal TA, Ogundoyin OO, et al. Clinical predictors and outcome of bowel resection in paediatric intussusception. Afr Health Sci 2020; 20: 1463–1470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mendiratta P, Yadav A, Borse N. Paediatric small-bowel intussusception on ultrasound - a case report with differentiating features from the ileocolic subtype. J Ultrason 2021; 21: 70–73. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lioubashevsky N, Hiller N, Rozovsky K, et al. Ileocolic versus small-bowel intussusception in children: can US enable reliable differentiation? Radiology 2013; 269: 266–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ajao AE, Lawal TA, Ogundoyin OO, et al. Clinical predictors and outcome of bowel resection in paediatric intussusception. Afr Health Sci 2020; 20: 1463–1470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ogundoyin OO, Olulana DI, Lawal TA. Childhood intussusception: impact of delay in presentation in a developing country. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2016; 13: 166–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The article contains all necessary data within the manuscript. The authors will provide the data upon request.


