Comparison 3. Avanti versus Durex Gossamer (latex) condom.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Nonclinical breakage ‐ per condom	1	347	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.92 [0.20, 18.60]
2 Clinical breakage ‐ per condom	1	342	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.82 [0.25, 2.72]
3 Total breakage ‐ per condom	1	347	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.98 [0.34, 2.86]
4 Total breakage ‐ per couple	1	64	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.72 [0.45, 6.55]
5 Complete slippage ‐ per condom	1	342	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.36 [0.53, 10.54]
6 Complete slippage ‐ per couple	1	64	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	3.86 [0.63, 23.61]
7 Partial slippage ‐ per condom	1	342	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.36 [0.75, 2.46]
8 Partial slippage ‐ per couple	1	64	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.72 [0.92, 8.02]
9 Total clinical failure ‐ per condom	1	342	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.25 [0.48, 3.22]
10 Total failure ‐ per condom	1	347	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.33 [0.55, 3.21]
11 Total failure ‐ per couple	1	64	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.56 [0.81, 8.06]
12 Felt "identical" or "almost identical" to coitus without condom ‐ per male	1	342	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.76 [0.50, 1.15]
13 "Easy" or "fairly easy" to don condom ‐ per male	1	342	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.58 [0.34, 0.99]
14 Coitus with condom was "comfortable" ‐ per male	1	342	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.62 [0.35, 1.08]
15 "Excellent" or "good" acceptability ‐ per male	1	64	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.61 [0.23, 1.61]
16 "Excellent" or "good" acceptability ‐ per female	1	64	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.01 [0.38, 2.69]
17 Preferred choice ‐ per male	1	64	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.75 [0.58, 5.25]
18 Preferred choice ‐ per female	1	64	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.29 [0.41, 4.06]