Comparison 5. Avanti versus Trojan‐Enz (latex) condom.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Nonclinical breakage ‐ per condom	1	306	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.14 [0.00, 6.82]
2 Clinical breakage ‐ per condom	1	301	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.76 [0.39, 19.82]
3 Total breakage ‐ per condom	1	305	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.51 [0.26, 8.82]
4 Complete slippage ‐ per condom	1	301	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.41 [0.54, 10.78]
5 Total clinical failure ‐ per condom	1	301	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.58 [0.78, 8.58]
6 Total failure ‐ per condom	1	305	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.03 [0.72, 5.71]
7 Preference ‐ per male (Avanti versus Tactylon versus Trojan‐Enz)	1	102	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.53 [0.23, 1.22]
8 Preference ‐ per female (Avanti versus Tactylon versus Trojan‐Enz)	1	102	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.76 [0.33, 1.76]