Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD003550. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003550.pub2

Comparison 7. Standard Tactylon versus LifeStyles (latex) condom.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pregnancy ‐ per female 1 622 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.42 [0.75, 2.68]
2 Six‐month discontinuation ‐ per couple 1 622 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.81, 1.58]
3 Nonclinical breakage ‐ per condom 1 2758 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.41 [0.13, 1.30]
4 Clinical breakage ‐ per condom 1 2714 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.09 [2.42, 6.90]
5 Total breakage ‐ per condom 1 2758 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.78 [1.72, 4.49]
6 Complete slippage ‐ per condom 1 2714 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.21, 1.42]
7 Total clinical failure ‐ per condom 1 2714 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.59 [1.63, 4.11]
8 Total failure ‐ per condom 1 2758 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.02 [1.32, 3.11]
9 Recommend ‐ per male 1 553 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.37, 0.90]
10 Recommend ‐ per female 1 560 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.42, 1.05]