Comparison 8. Standard Tactylon versus Trojan‐Enz (latex) condom.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Pregnancy ‐ per female	1	623	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.42 [0.75, 2.69]
2 Six‐month discontinuation ‐ per couple	1	623	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.39 [0.99, 1.94]
3 Nonclinical breakage ‐ per condom	3	3498	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.50 [0.22, 1.14]
4 Clinical breakage ‐ per condom	3	3457	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.64 [1.63, 4.28]
5 Total breakage ‐ per condom	3	3499	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.72 [1.13, 2.62]
6 Complete slippage ‐ per condom	3	3457	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.78 [0.34, 1.77]
7 Partial slippage ‐ per condom	1	478	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.00 [0.66, 1.52]
8 Total clinical failure ‐ per condom	3	3457	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.94 [1.28, 2.95]
9 Total failure ‐ per condom	3	3499	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.43 [0.99, 2.09]
10 Preference ‐ per male (Avanti versus Tactylon versus Trojan‐Enz)	1	102	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.0 [0.45, 2.22]
11 Preference ‐ per male (Tactylon versus Trojan‐Enz)	1	98	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.91 [0.87, 4.20]
12 Preference ‐ per female (Avanti versus Tactylon versus Trojan‐Enz)	1	102	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.19 [0.53, 2.66]
13 Preference ‐ per female (Tactylon versus Trojan‐Enz)	1	98	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.62 [0.74, 3.57]
14 Recommend ‐ per male	1	552	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.68 [0.44, 1.04]
15 Recommend ‐ per female	1	556	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.55 [0.34, 0.88]