Comparison 12. Low‐Modulus Tactylon versus Aladan (latex) condom.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Clinical breakage ‐ per condom	1	2341	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	3.85 [2.30, 6.45]
2 Complete slippage ‐ per condom	1	2341	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.69 [0.30, 1.59]
3 Total clinical failure ‐ per condom	1	2341	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	2.43 [1.56, 3.78]
4 Medical event ‐ per condom by male	1	2393	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.63 [0.37, 1.06]
5 Medical event ‐ per condom by female	1	2393	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.61 [0.43, 0.85]
6 Preference ‐ per male (Standard versus Baggy versus Low‐Modulus Tactylon versus Aladan)	1	790	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.63 [1.20, 2.23]
7 Preference ‐ per female (Standard versus Baggy versus Low‐Modulus Tactylon versus Aladan)	1	790	Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.48 [1.08, 2.01]