Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2023 Oct 30;25(4):974–983. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.018

Table 2.

Spearman Rho’s correlations among outcomes and covariates

Pain status Sex Race Income BMI Horvath EAA Hannum EAA PhenoAge EAA Chrono Age Dunedin PACE Pain Severity
Pain status 1
Sex −0.017 1
Race 0.162 0.017 1
Income .234* 0.003 .229* 1
BMI −.237* 0.081 −.332** −0.158 1
Horvath EAA 0.181 0.007 0.074 −0.005 −0.048 1
Hannum EAA 0.034 0.028 .210* 0.048 −0.087 .674** 1
PhenoAge EAA −0.035 0.1 0.153 −0.051 0.071 .420** .417** 1
Chrono Age −.221* −0.056 −0.084 0.049 0.106 −.565** −.594** −.207* 1
Dunedin PACE −.359** 0.083 −.364** −.328** .513** −.264** −.240** 0.119 .409** 1
Pain Severity −.849** 0.049 −.247** −.377** .257** −.232* −0.088 −0.053 .298** .453** 1
Pain Interference −.819** 0.065 −.193* −.342** .302** −.265** −0.13 −0.002 .287** .476** .885**
*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level

**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

BMI = body mass index; EAA = Epigenetic age acceleration measured as the difference between epigenetic age and chronological age.