Table 6.

Preference for strategies to improve cancer screening by mammogram screening status (n = 110)

Selected the following	Compliant (n = 52)	Ever had test but not compliant (n = 43)	Never had test (n = 15)	p value
Printed materials such as letters, brochures, and newsletters	49 (94%)	39 (91%)	12 (80%)	0.2
One-on-one education	48 (92%)	40 (93%)	13 (87%)	0.8
Having community health representatives (CHRs) or patient navigators help obtain screening	48 (92%)	36 (84%)	13 (87%)	0.4
Reminders such as postcards, emails, or phone messages	47 (90%)	41 (95%)	13 (87%)	0.3
Videos in the clinic waiting room	45 (87%)	40 (93%)	11 (73%)	0.14
Having flexible clinic hours	45 (87%)	35 (81%)	13 (87%)	0.8
Offering transportation to the clinic	44 (85%)	35 (81%)	11 (73%)	0.6
Group education	44 (85%)	33 (77%)	9 (60%)	0.14
Offering translation or interpretation services at the clinic	43 (83%)	39 (91%)	11 (73%)	0.3
Offering screening through non-clinical settings such as mailing for colorectal cancer screening	42 (81%)	33 (77%)	11 (73%)	0.8
Reducing co-payments for testing	42 (81%)	39 (91%)	10 (67%)	0.086
Public service announcements (PSAs) on the radio	41 (79%)	36 (84%)	12 (80%)	0.8
Home visits for education	39 (75%)	35 (81%)	8 (53%)	0.1
Offering child-care services	36 (69%)	31 (72%)	10 (67%)	0.9
Using social media such as Facebook, YouTube, twitter	24 (46%)	23 (53%)	8 (53%)	0.7

n (%). Fisher’s exact test; Pearson’s Chi-squared test