Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 16;41(4):1526–1552. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02727-3

Table 3.

Univariate Cox regression analysis for thromboembolic events with onset before week 12

Category Number No. of events
(%)
Hazard ratio
(95% CI)a
P valueb
Age (years)
  < 65 206 7 (3.4) Ref 0.071
  ≥ 65 238 17 (7.1) 2.21 (0.92–5.32)
Previous ESA treatment
  Naive 88 8 (9.1) 2.11 (0.90–4.93) 0.078
  Conversion 356 16 (4.5) Ref
Previous ESA treatment, monthly dose (µg)c
  < 40 137 10 (7.3) Ref 0.276
  40 to < 160 254 10 (3.9) 0.52 (0.22–1.24)
  ≥ 160 53 4 (7.5) 0.98 (0.31–3.13)
Type of dialysis
  Hemodialysis 388 24 (6.2) Inf 0.059
  Peritoneal dialysis 56 0 (0.0) Ref
Dialysis vintage (months)
  ≤ 4 83 9 (10.8) 2.74 (1.20–6.26) 0.013
  > 4 361 15 (4.2) Ref
History of thromboembolism
  No 329 16 (4.9) Ref 0.387
  Yes 115 8 (7.0) 1.45 (0.62–3.39)
History of cardiovascular event
  No 382 21 (5.5) Ref 0.822
  Yes 62 3 (4.8) 0.87 (0.26–2.92)
Concomitant use of IV iron therapy
  No 334 24 (7.2) Inf 0.003
  Yes 110 0 (0.0) Ref
Concomitant use of oral iron therapy (including ferric citrate)
  No 271 21 (7.7) 4.61 (1.38–15.46) 0.006
  Yes 173 3 (1.7) Ref
Concomitant use of IV or oral iron therapy (including ferric citrate)
  No 179 21 (11.7) 11.25 (3.36–37.71) < 0.001
  Yes 265 3 (1.1) Ref

CI confidence interval, ESA erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, Inf infinite, IV intravenous, Ref reference

aEstimated using Cox proportional hazards model

bP values based on log-rank test to test the null hypothesis of no difference in incidence across subgroup categories

cESA monthly dose was calculated by converting to darbepoetin alfa unit