Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 21;14(3):e079581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079581

Table 2.

The frequency and percentages of respondents submitting the different types of reports to organisations and reporting platforms

Funder(s) Researchfish* Sponsor† Ethics committee CRN CTU HEI
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Progress updates 126 (89) 56 (39) 18 (13) 38 (27) 11 (8) 8 (6) 21 (15)
Final report 107 (75) 29 (20) 17 (12) 29 (20) 5 (4) 10 (7) 21 (15)
Dissemination 91 (64) 84 (59) 8 (6) 7 (5) 4 (3) 5 (4) 38 (27)
Budget 88 (62) 5 (4) 12 (8) 2 (1) 3 (2) 5 (4) 59 (42)
Impact 76 (54) 80 (56) 11 (8) 4 (3) 4 (3) 5 (4) 47 (33)
Engagement 73 (51) 64 (45) 6 (4) 5 (4) 3 (2) 4 (3) 23 (16)
PPI 69 (49) 25 (18) 8 (6) 14 (10) 2 (1) 5 (4) 15 (11)
Recruitment updates 66 (46) 12 (8) 13 (9) 18 (13) 33 (23) 11 (8) 16 (11)
Ethics approvals 59 (42) 5 (4) 31 (22) 65 (46) 8 (6) 12 (8) 41 (29)
Protocol changes 57 (40) 2 (1) 31 (22) 59 (42) 8 (6) 15 (11) 18 (13)
Personnel changes 57 (40) 6 (4) 15 (11) 9 (6) 5 (4) 8 (6) 32 (23)
Awards 46 (32) 61 (43) 9 (6) 1 (1) 2 (1) 3 (2) 45 (32)
Collaboration 43 (30) 60 (42) 7 (5) 2 (1) 3 (2) 4 (3) 34 (24)
Interim analysis 28 (20) 4 (3) 8 (6) 5 (4) 3 (2) 8 (6) 3 (2)
Average number of reports completed per respondent 7 (SD: 4) 3 (SD: 3) 1 (SD: 3) 2 (SD: 2) 1 (SD: 1) 1 (SD: 2) 3 (SD: 3)

n=143; bold indicates top 2 submitted documents for each organisation based on percentages.

*Researchfish is an external reporting platform used by funding organisations to collect data on funded projects.

†Reported only if not HEI.

CRN, Clinical Research Network; CTU, Clinical Trials Unit; HEI, Higher Education Institution; PPI, patient and public involvement.