Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 May 13;28(3):1023–1036. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02132-1

Table 3.

The univariate logistic regression model for response to CRT

Variables P value Hazard ratio 95% CI
Men 0.797 1.142 0.414–3.146
Age 0.501 1.0113 0.976–1.052
Hypertension 0.390 0.672 0.272–1.662
NT-proBNP 0.091 1.000 1.000–1.000
QRS duration (ms) 0.004 1.033 1.010–1.056
NS-VT 0.008 0.259 0.095–0.704
LVEF 0.161 0.967 0.922–1.014
NYHA functional class 0.100 0.549 0.268–1.122
Scar burden 0.036 0.960 0.924–0.997
LV lead in the scarred myocardium 0.013 0.263 0.091–0.757
Systolic PSD (o) 0.013 0.973 0.952–0.994
Systolic PBW (o) 0.007 0.993 0.987–0.998
Diastolic PSD (o) 0.006 0.971 0.950–0.992
Diastolic PBW (o) 0.003 0.992 0.986–0.997

CI, confidence intervals; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-natriuretic brain natriuretic peptide; NS-VT, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia