. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 25.

Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Feb 14;28(6):2545–2556. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02040-4

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of segmental perfusion uptake rate, wall motion and thickening scores for the prediction of hibernating myocardium in the segments with decreased perfusion

			Multivariate model 1		Multivariate model 2		Multivariate model 3
	Univariate analysis		Perfusion uptake rate + WM		Perfusion uptake rate + WT		Perfusion uptake rate + WT +WM
Variables (segmental)	OR(95%CI)	P value	OR(95%CI)	P value	OR(95%CI)	P value	OR(95%CI)	P value
Perfusion uptake rate	0.951 (0.937–0.964)	< 0.001	0.958(0.944–0.972)	< 0.001	0.965(0.950–0.979)	< 0.001	0.967(0.952–0.981)	< 0.001
Wall motion (WM)	1.539 (1.348–1.757)	< 0.001	1.430(1.248–1.639)	< 0.001	-	-	1.242(1.072–1.439)	0.004
Wall thickening (WT)	2.269 (1.860–2.768)	< 0.001	-	-	1.983(1.618–2.430)	< 0.001	1.763(1.421–2.186)	< 0.001

WM wall motion, WT wall thickening, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio