Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2023 Nov 21;18(12):3690–3731. doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00892-x

Fig. 6 |. Comparison of runtimes of R CoGAPS versus PyCoGAPS.

Fig. 6 |

a, Benchmarking on a small dataset showed a startup cost associated with multiprocessing in distributed PyCoGAPS. b, In this small dataset, meanChiSq converges after a small number of iterations. meanChiSq values may differ slightly between distributed and single-threaded CoGAPS runs due to differing input matrix dimension. c, Benchmarking on a large single-cell dataset yielded these estimated runtimes, with Python slightly outperforming R.