Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Wilderness Environ Med. 2023 Dec 27;35(1 Suppl):45S–66S. doi: 10.1177/10806032231218722

Table 3.

Microorganism susceptibility to filtration.

Organism Approximate aize (μm) Recommended filter rating (μm)
Virusesa 0.03 Ultrafilter, nanofilter, reverse osmosis
Escherichia coli Campylobacter Vibrio cholerae 0.5 by 3–8 0.2–0.4 by 1.5–3.5 0.5 by 1.5–3.0 0.2–0.4 (microfilter)
Cryptosporidium oocyst 2–6 1 (microfilter)
Giardia cyst Entamoeba histolytica cyst 6–10 by 8–15 5–30 (average 10) 3–5 (microfilter)
Nematode eggs 30–40 by 50–80 20 (microfilter)
Schistosome cercariae Dracunculus larvae 50 by 100 20 by 500 Coffee filter or fine cloth, or double thickness closely woven cloth
a

Microfilters (most filters with pore size of 0.1–0.2 μm) can filter bacteria and protozoan cysts but are not effective for virus removal unless designed to rely on electrostatic trapping of viruses. Hollow-fiber filters with 0.02 μm pores and reverse osmosis filters are capable of filtering viruses.