Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2023 Jun 1;93(2):134–142. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003178

TABLE 3.

Unadjusted and Multivariate Logistic Regression Models to Assess the Relationship Between Achieving Durable Viral Suppression and the Intervention Among Adults With HIV Participating in CoRECT, Year 2016–2019, Pooled (N = 1893)

Effect Risk Ratio 95% CI
Unadjusted Risk Ratio by Site
 Combined by site 1.02 0.92 1.14
 Connecticut 1.04 0.88 1.22
 Massachusetts 0.92 0.76 1.10
 Philadelphia 1.14 0.93 1.38
Adjusted risk ratio
 Intervention vs. Standard of Care 0.98 0.88 1.09
 Connecticut vs. Philadelphia 1.03 0.95 1.12
 Massachusetts vs. Philadelphia 1.00 0.92 1.08
Age (vs. 18–29 years)
 30–39 1.16 0.92 1.46
 40–49 1.34 1.07 1.68
 50–59 1.43 1.14 1.79
 60 years or older 1.58 1.24 2.02
Race (vs. Non-Hispanic Black)
 Hispanic/Latino 1.00 0.86 1.16
 Non-Hispanic White 1.10 0.95 1.27
 Other 1.10 0.78 1.56
Birth sex (vs. Male)
 Female 0.95 0.82 1.11
Viral load suppression before randomization
 Yes 2.87 2.26 3.62
CD4 count (vs. <50 cells/uL)
 51–199 1.08 0.91 1.28
 200–349 1.30 1.09 1.54
 350–499 1.13 0.92 1.39
 500+ 1.26 1.04 1.53
Exposure category (vs. MSM, MSM/HET) *
 IDU (IDU or HET/IDU) 0.99 0.83 1.18
 MSM/IDU or MSM/HET/IDU 1.08 0.90 1.29
 HET 0.93 0.72 1.21
 Other 1.07 0.878 1.30
*

HET = heterosexual; IDU = injection drug use; MSM = men who have sex with men; Other = perinatal, no identified risk, or not in record.