Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 15;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41824-024-00197-6

Table 4.

Correlations between factors and Hausdorff distance in gross tumor volume

PET CT MRI
No HD (median ± SD)/ correlation coefficient (ρ) p-value No HD (median ± SD)/ correlation coefficient (ρ) p-value No HD (median ± SD)/ correlation coefficient (ρ) p-value
Primary site
Oropharyngeal cancer 4 0 1 4 1.24 ± 0.64 0.77 3 1.89 ± 1.20 0.36
Other 4 0 4 1.24 ± 0.40 5 0.73 ± 0.11
Stage
De novo 5 0 1 5 1.22 ± 0.55 0.65 5 0.73 ± 0.12 0.36
Recurrent 3 0 3 1.26 ± 0.48 3 1.88 ± 1.20
Dental artifacts and GTV on the same axial plane
Yes 4 0 1 4 1.17 ± 0.43 1 4 1.61 ± 1.10 0.3
No 4 0 4 1.30 ± 0.60 4 0.71 ± 0.13
Size of GTV ρ = 0.52 0.18 ρ = 0.96 0.0001
Distance between dental artifacts and GTV ρ = −0.26 0.53 ρ =  −0.31 0.44

PET = positron emission tomography, CT = computed tomography, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, HD = Hausdorff distance, GTV = gross tumor volume, SD = standard deviation