Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Inform Health Soc Care. 2023 Aug 21;48(4):353–369. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2023.2240411

Table 3.

Results of The Three Sorted InfoViz Tools and Interpreter Tool Preferences

Part 2: Results of The Three Sorted InfoViz Tools (N = 21*)
Tool 1: Sensation Tool 2: Severity Tool 3: Localization
graphic file with name nihms-1920231-t0002.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1920231-t0003.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1920231-t0004.jpg

Description Organized the first tool by two types of pain sensation: depth (first three columns) and tightness (last column), reading from top to bottom for each column. Organized the second tool by pain severity, reading from left to right and beginning with minimal severity at the uppermost rows and progressing to the most severe pain at the bottom rows. Organized based on localized (first two rows) versus generalized or widespread pain (last two rows), reading from left to right in rows

Part 3: Results of Interpreter Tool Preferences (N = 23*)

Young Adult Bilingual (n=9) 5 0 4

Interpreter (n=12) 3 0 9

Total 8 0 13

Note:

*

Two interpreters did not participate in the tool and text preference due to poor internet connection during the WebEx virtual meeting.