Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Apr 27;76(1):196–219. doi: 10.1177/17470218221090483

Table 2.

Hierarchical regression model outputs for competitor effects by competitor type. Orthographic competitor effects were the DV. Model 1 included age and the visual-only task as predictors; model 2 added the auditory competitor effects. B and p for predictors are from model 2.

Model 1 R2 Model 1 p Model 2 R2 Model 2 p Age B; p Fix. dur. B; p Visual-only B; p Auditory B; p
Cohort .0053 .95 .0054 .98 .00054; .68 4.8e-6; .91 .082; .57 .010; .93
Frame .015 .79 .022 .82 .00020; .87 −4.0e-5; .33 −.024; .86 −.092; .48
Rhyme .082 .11 .082 .20 −.0020; .055 l.2e-5; .75 −.26; .028 −.015; .89

Significant effects are in bold.