Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Mar 27;45(9):744–749. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.02.005

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population.

Variable Total N = 521 (%) Choledocholithiasis on ERCP N = 293 (%) No choledocholithiasis on ERCP N = 228 (%) p value
Gender, female 409 (78) 236 (80) 173 (76) 0.20
Race, Hispanic 388 (74) 215 (73) 173 (76) 0.81
Very strong predictors
 Total bilirubin > 4 mg/dL 167 (32) 120 (41) 47 (21) <0.001
 Common bile duct stone on ultrasound 43 (8) 38 (13) 5 (2) <0.001
 Clinical ascending cholangitis 23 (4) 19 (7) 4 (2) <0.01
Strong predictors
 Total bilirubin, 1.8–4.0 mg/dL 172 (33) 93 (32) 79 (35) 0.48
 Dilated common bile duct on ultrasound 260 (50) 171 (59) 89 (39) <0.001
Moderate predictors
 Abnormal liver function tests 499 (95) 286 (98) 213 (93) 0.02
 Age > 55 years 86 (16) 54 (19) 32 (14) 0.18
 Gallstone pancreatitis 134 (26) 64 (22) 70 (31) 0.02
Very strong predictors <0.001
 None 316 (61) 143 (49) 173 (76)
 One 177 (34) 125 (43) 52 (23)
 Two 27 (5) 24 (8) 3 (1)
 Three 1 (0.2) 1 (0.3) (0)
Strong predictors <0.01
 None 158 (30) 75 (26) 83 (37)
 One 294 (56) 171 (58) 123 (54)
 Two 69 (13) 47 (16) 22 (10)
Moderate predictors 0.33
 None 18 (3) 7 (2) 11 (5)
 One 323 (62) 189 (65) 134 (59)
 Two 154 (30) 82 (28) 72 (32)
 Three 26 (5) 15 (5) 11 (5)
High probability 264 (51) 189 (65) 75 (33) <0.001
Intermediate probability 249 (48) 102 (35) 147 (65) <0.001
Low probability 8 (2) 2 (1) 6 (3) 0.07

ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; CBD, common bile duct; US, ultrasound; LFT, liver function test.