Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 18;68(4):701–717. doi: 10.1007/s00484-023-02616-y

Table 5.

Hidden Markov Model results for tree ring indices, with spring temperature from the CRU record added to the model as a covariate. Model results are included for the Cloquet Forestry Center (CFC) and Marcell Experimental Forest (MEF) for three species, Pinus resinosa (PIRE), Picea mariana (PIMA), and Larix laricina (LALA). Model performance for the one-state, two-state, and two-state + covariate models were evaluated by the change in Akaike Information Criterion (Δ AIC and Δ BIC). Model log-likelihood is also indicated for all models and is compared among models using a log-likelihood ratio test ( = p < 0.1, *p < 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01). The superior model is indicated in bold

Models with no covariates Models with CRU temperature covariate
n state = 1 n state = 2 Model selection n state = 2 + temp Model selection
Record AIC BIC Log L AIC BIC Log L Δ AIC AIC BIC Log L Δ AIC
CFC PIMA 90.73 85.25 47.36 −122.58 −103.43 68.29** −31.85 121.69 97.07 69.85 0.89
MEF PIMA 32.27 26.8 18.14 56.49 37.33 35.24 24.22 −59.3 −34.67 38.65* −2.81
CFC PIRE 88.66 83.19 46.33 −115.22 −96.07 64.61** −26.56 113.75 89.12 65.87 1.47
MEF PIRE 15.65 11.24 9.83 −20.17 −4.74 17.09** −4.52 16.25 3.59 17.13 3.92
MEF LALA 113.29 118.44 54.65 82.91 100.93 34.45 30.38 77.57 100.74 -29.79** −23.36