Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;15:1348144. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1348144

Table 4.

Partial least squares regression (PLS) and simple linear regression (SLR) model performance metrics for Typha dry mass predictions.

PLS Typha Dry Mass Training Data Statistics
Response Variable: sqrt [Typha Dry Mass]
Predictor Variables: log[Ramet Area at 30 cm] + Inflorescence Presence + sqrt[Organic Matter Depth] + Total Ramet Height
PLS Components: 4
Cross-Validation Segments: 10
RMSECV Typha Dry Mass: 0.47 g
Explained Variance: 85.01%
SLR Typha Dry Mass Training Data Statistics
Response Variable: sqrt [Typha Dry Mass)
Predictor Variable: Total Ramet Height
Cross-Validation Segments: 10
RMSECV Typha Dry Mass: 2.27 g
Explained Variance: 18.38%
Typha Dry Mass Test Data Statistics
Number of Permutations: 1,000
Training/Test Replication: n = 63 / n = 12
PLS DIFF (mean ± 1 sd): -0.53 g ± 8.70 g
SLR DIFF (mean ± 1 sd): -2.37 g ± 18.0 g

Training data statistics for PLS and SLR models present predictor variable(s), components selection (PLS only), k-fold cross-validation segments, root mean square error of cross-validation (RMSECV), and explained model variance. Test data statistics are given for permutation models results to estimate accuracy of external data predictions. Permutation results are given by mean ± 1 standard deviation of: DIFF = [predicted Typha dry mass – reference Typha dry mass]. All presented Typha dry mass results were back-transformed to show original data collection scale.