Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 4;14(3):2514–2527. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1143

Table 3. Comparison of stratified longitudinal strain and MW parameters in the derivation set.

Variable HFpEF group (n=49) Control group (n=46) P value
GLSendo (%) −21.13±2.57 −24.18±1.90 <0.001
GLSmyo (%) −18.52±2.31 −20.46±1.67 <0.001
GLSepi (%) −16.37±1.38 −17.59±0.96 <0.001
ΔGLS (%) −4.76±1.28 −6.58±0.97 <0.001
GWI (mmHg%) 1,797.02±251 2,099.78±289 <0.001
GCW (mmHg%) 2,092.18±256 2,386.24±301 <0.001
GWW (mmHg%) 87.48 [66.23–121.50] 60.50 [48.75–73.75] <0.001
GWE (%) 94 [92–96] 98 [96.75–99] <0.001

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD or M [P25–P75]. MW, myocardial work; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; GLSendo, global longitudinal strain of subendocardium; GLSmyo, global longitudinal strain of myocardium; GLSepi, global longitudinal strain of subepicardium; ΔGLS, transmural gradient of global longitudinal strain; GWI, global myocardial work index; GCW, global myocardial constructive work; GWW, global myocardial wasted work; GWE, global myocardial work efficiency.