Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 22;67(1):e11. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.4

Table 2.

Relative risk (hazard ratios) of ID in offspring to mothers with T1D, compared to offspring to mothers without T1D

Model Number of subjects Rate (cases; person years) Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Crude# 1,406,441 63 (8,523; 13,553,218) 1.90 (1.53–2.36)
Adjusted## 1.71 (1.38–2.11)
Repeated main analysis by subgroups
Singletons### 1,365,316 62 (8,157; 13,147,887) 1.77 (1.43–2.20)
Children born 1998–2002 #### 356,379 62 (2,194; 3,526,123) 1.64 (1.03–2.60)
Children born 2003–2007 #### 397,230 58 (2,250; 3,892,116) 1.69 (1.13–2.53)

Abbreviation: CI, two-sided 95% confidence interval.

Note: # Crude: Adjusting for birth years by natural cubic splines; ##Adjusted: Crude + further adjusted for maternal and paternal age by natural cubic splines, parental psychiatric history (yes/no) and maternal and paternal education at delivery; ### Adjusted model excluding twins, that is, singletons only; ####Adjusted model – Each child followed for at least 10 years to allow a comparison not affected by differences in length of follow-up.