Table 2.
Odds ratios for the best model 1 selected based on the AIC
| OR [CI] | Statistic (z-value) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lithium salts a [yes] | 0.59 [0.35–0.95] | −2.1 | 0.036 |
| Age | 1.02 [1.01–1.04] | 2.58 | 0.010 |
| QIDS-SR (Box–Cox) | 1.24 [1.11–1.38] | 3.86 | 0.0001 |
| PSQI | 1.13 [1.07–1.19] | 4.42 | <0.0001 |
| MAThyS Motivation b | |||
| [16 – 20] | 1.61 [0.99–2.66] | 1.89 | 0.059 |
| MAThyS Motivation b | |||
| [21 – 40] | 1.90 [1.11–3.28] | 2.33 | 0.020 |
| BDHI Expressive Component |
1.02 [0.99–1.05] | 1.68 | 0.09 |
a
The reference for comparison is no lithium intake.
b
The reference for comparison is the score [0–15] of the MAThyS motivation subscale.
Abbreviations: BDH, Buss–Durkee Hostility Inventory; MAThyS, multidimensional assessment of thymic states; PSQI, Pittsburgh sleep quality index; QIDS-SR, quick inventory of depressive self-report.