. 2024 Mar 26;24:381. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12156-2

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of colposcopy in detecting CIN2 + among patients with transformation zone type 3

Group	Sensitivity (95%CI)	Specificity (95%CI)	Accuracy (95%CI)	FPR (95%CI)	FNR (95%CI)	PPV (95%CI)	NPV (95%CI)
Junior	41.3% (27.1–55.5%)	95.8% (94.0-97.6%)	68.6% (64.6–72.5%)	4.2% (2.4–5.9%)	58.7% (44.5–72.9%)	48.7% (33.0-64.4%)	94.4% (92.4–96.5%)
Senior	63.2% (47.8–78.5%)	98.0% (96.1–99.9%)	80.6% (75.6–85.6%)	2.0% (0.1–3.9%)	36.8% (21.5–52.2%)	85.7% (72.8–98.7%)	93.4% (90.0-96.7%)

Group

Sensitivity
(95%CI)

Specificity
(95%CI)

Accuracy
(95%CI)

FPR
(95%CI)

FNR
(95%CI)

PPV
(95%CI)

NPV
(95%CI)

Junior

41.3%

(27.1–55.5%)

95.8%

(94.0-97.6%)

68.6%

(64.6–72.5%)

4.2%

(2.4–5.9%)

58.7%

(44.5–72.9%)

48.7%

(33.0-64.4%)

94.4%

(92.4–96.5%)

Senior

63.2%

(47.8–78.5%)

98.0%

(96.1–99.9%)

80.6%

(75.6–85.6%)

2.0%

(0.1–3.9%)

36.8%

(21.5–52.2%)

85.7%

(72.8–98.7%)

93.4%

(90.0-96.7%)

CIN2+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse; FPR, false positive rate; FNR, false negative rate; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value