Table 5.
Tomato vegetable classification using AI.
| References | AI methods | Dataset | Disease | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Francis and Deisy, 2019) | CNN | PlantVillage | Leaf spot and mosaic virus | CNN=87% |
| (Basavaiah and Anthony, 2020) | RF and DT | PlantVillage | Bacterial, Septoria, spider mite, target spot, and healthy | RF=94% |
| (K and Rao, 2019) | KNN and PNN | Self-collected | Miners, verticillium wilt, spider mites, and powdery mildew | KNN=91.88% |
| (Vadivel and Suguna, 2022) | BPNN, NN, CNN, SVM and RBF | PlantVillage | Bacterial spot, mosaic, Septoria, and yellow curl | CNN=99.4% |
| (Chakravarthy and Raman, 2020) | RestNet and Xception | PlantVillage | Early blight | 99.952% |
| (Kumar and Vani, 2019) | CNN | PlantVillage | Target spot, mosaic, septoria, and leaf mould | CNN=99.25% |
| (Kumari et al., 2019) | CNN | PlantVillage | Septoria leaf spot and leaf mold | CNN=100% |
| (Govardhan and Veena, 2019) | Random Forest | PlantVillage | Blight, both early and late, septoria leaf spot, spider mite, and mosaic | RF=95.2% |