Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 17;63(2):1178–1213. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01932-2

Table 4.

Respondents attitudes toward biobanking

Religious students Ambivalent/nonreligious students p
Have your ever heard about research biobanks? ns
 Yes 334 (73.2) 774 (74.1)
 No 122 (26.8) 270 (25.9)
What are your impressions when you hear a word “biobank”? < 0.00001
 Positive 164 (35.9) 567 (54.3)
 Negative 14 (3.1) 7 (0.7)
 Mixed, both positive and negative 165 (36.2) 195 (18.7)
 I do not know, it is irrelevant to me 113 (27.8) 275 (26.3)
Is there any research biobank in Poland? ns
 Yes 164 (36) 363 (34.8)
 No 2 (0.4) 6 (0.6)
 I don’t know 290 (64.6) 675 (64.6)
Should a biobank for research purposes be established in Poland? < 0.00001
 Definitely yes 137 (30.1) 507 (48.6)
 Rather yes 214 (46.9) 433 (41.5)
 Rather no 22 (4.8) 10 (0.9)
 Definitely no 5 (1.1) 0 (0)
 It is irrelevant to me 22 (4.8) 37 (3.5)
 I do not know 56 (12.3) 57 (5.5)
What would be your primary motivation for donating your biological material to a research biobank? < 0.00001
 To benefit society and future generations 34 (7.4) 43 (4.1)
 Progress in science, helping in generating new knowledge and development of therapies for various diseases 288 (63.2) 781 (74.8)
 To benefit my family, relatives, and mine own 65 (14.3) 72 (6.9)
 The desire to receive medical treatment/service, i.e., medical check-up or information about the research results 4 (0.9) 5 (0.5)
 The desire to know my health status 49 (10.7) 112 (10.7)
 To establishing good relations with healthcare workers 0 (0) 0 (0)
 The desire to receive financial gratification 4 (0.9) 14 (1.3)
 No answer 12 (2.6) 17 (1.6)
What would you expect in exchange of donation samples of your biological material to a research biobank? < 0.05
 Acknowledgments 12 (2.6) 16 (1.5)
 Results 86 (18.9) 163 (15.6)
 Personal health information (detection of disease or genetic predispositions) 318 (69.7) 805 (77.1)
 Financial gratification 18 (4) 35 (3.4)
 Nothing 22 (4.8) 25 (2.4)

The statistically significant results are given in boldface

ns statistically not significant