Table 2.
Examples of appropriability and lock-out of EngBio climate mitigation applications
| Appropriability | Lock-out risk | |
|---|---|---|
| High | Low | |
| High | Profitable applications of EngBio that are likely to face strong political resistance from established industries. | Profitable applications of EngBio that are likely to confront limited resistance from established industries. |
| Low | E.g. Synthetic animal proteins threaten agricultural producers that are often politically organised. | E.g. Synthetic biofuels enter a liquid global market; within many importer states there are no local producers so political opposition may be ineffective. |
| EngBio applications that reduce GHG emissions but do not compete with existing industries will rarely encounter established industry opposition. | EngBio applications that reduce GHG emissions but do not compete with existing industries are unlikely to face significant established industry opposition. | |
| E.g. Environmental release of GHG-consuming organisms. | E.g. Direct air capture in contained facilities. | |
Adapted from David Victor Global Warming Gridlock CUP 2011, p.130.
© David G. Victor 2011. Reproduced with permission of The Licensor through PLSclear.