Table 4.
Agreement of VF with OCT and OCTA on progression detection.
| OCT vs VF | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCT | κ (P value) | ||||
| Progressor | Non-progressor | Total | |||
| VF | Progressor | 6 (4%) | 5 (3%) | 11 | 0.26 (<0.001) |
| Non-progressor | 19 (13%) | 117 (80%) | 136 | ||
| Total | 25 | 122 | 147 | ||
| OCTA vs VF | |||||
| OCTA | κ (P value) | ||||
| Progressor | Non-progressor | Total | |||
| VF | Progressor | 4 (3%) | 7 (5%) | 11 | 0.08 (0.125) |
| Non-progressor | 29 (20%) | 107 (73%) | 136 | ||
| Total | 33 | 114 | 147 | ||
Significant P-values were bolded. MD mean deviation, OCT optical coherence tomography, OCTA optical coherence tomography angiography, VF visual field.