Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 28;38(5):930–936. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02806-3

Table 2.

Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic LPI versus that of observation (base-case and scenarios with different ages at entry and exit from the cohort).

Observation period Strategy Cost (JPY) Incremental cost (JPY) QALY Incremental QALY ICER (JPY/QALY)
40–59 years of age (20-year horizon, base-case) LPI 449,050 55,572 16.67 0.02 2,287,662
Observation 393,478 16.65
40–54 years of age (15-year horizon) LPI 368,602 60,784 13.10 0.02 3,958,450
Observation 307,818 13.09
40–49 years of age (10-year horizon) LPI 280,195 66,526 9.16 0.01 7,610,359
Observation 213,669 9.15
50–69 years of age (20-year horizon) LPI 449,037 55,615 16.67 0.02 2,294,626
Observation 393,421 16.65
50–64 years of age (15-year horizon) LPI 368,596 60,803 13.10 0.02 3,966,008
Observation 307,794 13.09
50–59 years of age (10-year horizon) LPI 280,194 66,531 9.16 0.01 7,617,443
Observation 213,663 9.15
40–99 years of age LPI 880,510 23,196 35.40 0.19 124,675
(60-year horizon) Observation 857,314 35.21

LPI laser peripheral iridotomy, JPY Japanese Yen, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.