Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 13;11:1370550. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1370550

Table 2.

Quantitative scoring matrix for nutrient prioritisation.

Scoring criterion Score Description
Priority nutrient scoring
Baseline score: evidence of inadequate intake 0 No inadequacy
1 ≥20- < 40 population less than EAROR ≥ 50- < 75% population less than AI
2 ≥40- < 60% population less than EAROR ≥ 75–100% population less than AI
3 ≥60- < 80% population less than EAR
4 ≥80% population less than EAR
Additional points: evidence of increased needs a 0 No or equivocal evidence
1 Consistent evidence or consensus for increased needs
Additional points: evidence of established association with health priority 0 No associated health priorities
1 One associated health priority
2 Two associated health priorities
3 Three associated health priorities
4 Four associated health priorities
5 Five associated health priorities
Nutrient of concern scoring
Baseline score: evidence of excess intake 0 No excess
1 ≥20- < 40% population greater than UL
2 ≥40- < 60% population greater than UL
3 ≥60- < 80% population greater than UL
4 ≥80% population greater than UL
Additional points: evidence of decreased needs a 0 No or equivocal evidence
1 Consistent evidence or consensus for decreased needs
Additional points: evidence of established adverse association with health priority 0 No associated health priorities
1 One associated health priority
2 Two associated health priorities
3 Three associated health priorities
4 Four or more associated health priorities
5 Five associated health priorities
Total score Priority nutrient score minus nutrient of concern score
a

Relative to the current EAR, RDI, or AI. AI, Adequate Intake; EAR, Estimated Average Requirement; UL, Upper Level of Intake.