Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 26;12(3):23259671241236804. doi: 10.1177/23259671241236804

Table 2.

Comparison of Patient Demographic and Surgical Data Based on Presence or Absence of a Posterior Drawer a

Variable Positive Posterior Drawer b
(n = 12)
Negative Posterior Drawer
(n = 25)
P
Posterior tibial slope, deg 6.4 ± 2.2 8.3 ± 3.4 .08
Age, y 30.0 ± 8.6 31.1 ± 11.4 .77
Male sex 9 (75.0) 20 (80.0) .73
Body mass index, kg/m2 29.7 ± 6.2 29.8 ± 5.1 .97
Tobacco use 4 (33.3) 7 (28.0) .74
Diabetes 1 (8.3) 0 (0.0) NA
Revision PCLR 3 (25.0) 0 (0.0) NA
PCL graft type
 Achilles allograft 5 (41.6) 11 (44.0) .89
 Tibialis anterior allograft 6 (50.0) 10 (40.0) .56
 Peroneus longus allograft 2 (16.7) 4 (16.0) .96
Combined PCLR 8 (66.7) 17 (68.0) .93
 PCL + MCL/PMC 0 (0.0) 3 (12.0) NA
 PCL + LCL/PLC 8 (66.7) 11 (44.0) .19
 PCL + MCL/PMC + LCL/PLC 0 (0.0) 3 (12.0) NA
a

Data are reported as mean ± SD or n (%). LCL, lateral collateral ligament; MCL, medial collateral ligament; NA, not applicable; PLC, posterolateral corner; PMC, posteromedial corner.

b

A positive posterior drawer was defined as grade 1 or higher.