Table 4.
Comparison of Patient Demographic and Outcomes Data Based on Isolated Versus Combined PCLR a
| Variable | Isolated PCLR (n = 12) |
Combined PCLR
b
(n = 25) |
P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Posterior tibial slope, deg | 10.1 ± 2.9 | 6.6 ± 2.8 | .001 |
| Age, y | 25.7 ± 33.2 | 33.2 ± 11.4 | .04 |
| Male sex | 7 (58.3) | 16 (64.0) | .11 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 30.7 ± 7.3 | 29.2 ± 4.3 | .46 |
| Length of PRO follow-up, y | 6.5 ± 5.1 | 5.5 ± 2.6 | .42 |
| IKDC score | 69.9 ± 20.0 | 75.7 ± 23.7 | .47 |
| Lysholm score | 70.4 ± 21.3 | 81.8 ± 19.3 | .11 |
| Complications | 2 (16.7) | 3 (12.0) | .69 |
| Reoperations | 2 (16.7) | 3 (12.0) | .69 |
| Posterior drawer | 4 (33.3) | 6 (24.0) | .55 |
a
Data are reported as mean ± SD or n (%). Boldface P values indicate statistically significant difference between groups (P < .05). IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; PCLR, posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; PRO, patient-reported outcome.
b
PCLR combined with medial and/or lateral ligament reconstructions.