Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;13(3):253. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13030253

Table 1.

Systematic review studies classified according to first author, year of publication, publishing institution according to the WHO regional classification, number of evaluated studies, primary studied concepts, examined process and outcome measures as well as critical appraisal of quality of evidence.

Regions. Systematic Reviews/Year Approach Primary Concept Studies Process Measures Outcome Measures * AMSTAR-2 Quality Ref.
Europe (EUR) Baur 2017 Global Adverse Events 32 No Yes CL [36]
Chatzopoulou 2020 Global Antimicrobial Resistance 15 Yes Yes CL [37]
Chatzopoulou 2022 Global Antimicrobial Resistance 29 Yes Yes CL [38]
Corafa 2022 Global Critical Care 13 Yes Yes CL [39]
Davey 2013 Global Effectiveness 89 Yes Yes L [20]
Davey 2015 Global Behavior 116 Yes No CL [40]
Davey 2017 Global Safety and efficacy 221 Yes Yes H [20]
Donà 2020 Global Efficacy 113 No Yes CL [41]
Dik 2015 Global Economic impact 95 Yes No CL [26]
Helou 2020 Global Information Technology 13 No Yes CL [28]
Huebner 2019 Global Economic Impact 16 Yes No CL [42]
Kallen 2017 Global Quality Indicators 14 No Yes CL [43]
Lau 2022 Global Microbiological outcomes 117 Yes Yes CL [19]
Mas-Morey 2018 Global Role of Pharmacy 28 Yes No CL [44]
Micallef 2017 Global Information Technology 14 Yes Yes CL [45]
Monmaturapoj 2021 Global Role of Pharmacy 52 Yes Yes CL [46]
Monnier 2018 Global Quality Indicators 70 No Yes CL [47]
Nathwani 2019 Global Economic outcomes 164 Yes Yes CL [48]
O’Riordan 2021 Regional Quality Indicators 16 Yes Yes CL [49]
Porter 2021 Global Behavioral Factors 14 Yes No CL [50]
Pouly 2022 Global Behavioral Factors 124 Yes Yes CL [51]
Rajar 2021 Global Safety 12 Yes No H [35]
Rawson 2017 Global Information Technology 58 Yes No CL [52]
Rzewuska 2020 Global Implementation 145 No Yes CL [53]
Schuts 2016 Global Efficacy 15 Yes Yes CL [54]
Schuts 2021 Global Antimicrobial Resistance 145 Yes No L [25]
Schweitzer 2019 Global Quality of studies 825 Yes No CL [55]
Stanic 2018 Global Metrics 168 Yes Yes CL [56]
Tacconelli 2016 Global Surveillance 78 Yes Yes CL [14]
Van Dijck 2018 Global MLIC * 27 Yes No CL [57]
Warreman 2019 Global Behavioral Factors 9 Yes No CL [58]
Americas (AMR) Araujo Silva 2018 Global Effectiveness 9 Yes Yes L [59]
Bertollo 2018 Global Antimicrobial Resistance 26 No Yes CL [60]
Daniels 2021 Global Discharge medications. 6 Yes No CL [61]
Feazel 2014 Global Adverse Events 78 No Yes L [62]
Karanika 2016 Global Economic Impact 26 No Yes CL [29]
Kooda 2022 Global Role of Pharmacy 24 Yes Yes L [18]
Lindsay 2019 Global Critical care 11 No Yes CL [21]
Losier 2017 Global Emergency Department 43 Yes No CL [17]
Murray 2021 Global Antimicrobial Resistance 29 No Yes CL [63]
Rennert-May 2017 Global Guidelines 5 Yes No CL [64]
Rittmann 2019 Global Information Technology 45 Yes Yes CL [65]
Smith 2015 Global Efficacy 9 No Yes CL [66]
Wade 2021 Regional HCAIs ** 21 Yes Yes CL [67]
Wagner 2014 Regional Efficacy 37 Yes Yes CL [68]
West Pacific Region (WPR) Abo 2020 Global Efficacy 34 Yes Yes L [69]
Baysari 2016 Global Information Technology 45 Yes No CL [27]
Honda 2017 Regional Safety and efficacy 46 No Yes CL [16]
Lee 2018 Regional Safety and efficacy 77 No Yes CL [70]
Lim 2020 Global National Interventions 34 Yes No CL [71]
Roman 2018 Global Role of Pharmacy 15 Yes No CL [72]
Siachalinga 2022 Global Efficacy 28 Yes No L [73]
Tabah 2016 Regional Critical Care 14 Yes Yes CL [74]
East Mediterranean (EMRO) Ababneh 2021 Regional Implementation 20 Yes Yes CL [15]
Atamna 2021 Global Antimicrobial Resistance 63 Yes Yes CL [75]
Bitterman 2016 Global Antimicrobial consumption 80 Yes No CL [76]
Garwan 2022 Global Antimicrobial Switch 36 Yes Yes CL [77]
Hashad 2020 Regional Effectiveness 17 Yes No CL [78]
Keikha 22 Global Antimicrobial Resistance 17 No Yes L [79]
Nasr 2017 Regional Behavioral factors 20 Yes No CL [80]
Southeast Asia (SEAR) Ibrahim 2017 Global Economic Impact 5 No Yes CL [81]
Teerawattanapong 2017 Global Antimicrobial Resistance 42 Yes Yes CL [82]
Africa (AF) Akpan 2020 Regional Implementation 13 Yes Yes CL [83]

* AMSTAR-2: Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, evaluation tool to review the methodological quality of systematic reviews: H; high-quality review, M; moderate, L; low, CL; critically low. * MLIC: middle- and low-income countries. ** HCAIs: healthcare-associated infections.