Table 2.
Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | α | M(SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| 1. IPV victimizationa | — | .90 | 22.47 (35.95) | |||||
| 2. PO match | .30*** | — | —b | —b | ||||
| 3. Negative impact | .08 | .05 | — | .69 | .01 (.84) | |||
| 4. Positive impact | .03 | .10 | −.70*** | — | .78 | −.01 (.86) | ||
| 5. Court-related fear | .39*** | .30*** | .34*** | −.14 | — | .74 | .02 (.88) | |
| 6. Validation | .04 | .04 | −.66*** | .78*** | −.18* | — | .86 | −.06 (.92) |
| 7. Willingness to use the system in the future | .29*** | .15* | −.20** | .39*** | .37*** | .31*** | .81 | .08 (.82) |
Correlations are based on transformed scores and the mean and standard deviation are based on untransformed scores.
PO match was scored dichotomously (0 = mismatch, 1 = match).
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.